Literature DB >> 15933466

Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology.

Anne Brédart1, Carole Bouleuc, Sylvie Dolbeault.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarises current knowledge on the impact on patient satisfaction of initiatives undertaken to enhance the communication between doctors and their patients in oncology. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies have assessed the effectiveness of different approaches aimed at improving doctor-patient communication in oncology. These have been assessed on outcomes related to the patient (e.g., anxiety, quality of life, medical knowledge, satisfaction) or to the doctor (e.g., communication behaviour, attitudes). Patient satisfaction has been recognised as a particularly relevant outcome, and a positive effect of recent initiatives to improve the interaction between cancer patients and their doctors on patient satisfaction has been suggested.
SUMMARY: To better respond to cancer patients' health care needs, various strategies focusing on doctor-patient communication have been developed. Addressing patients' overall needs and sharing complex information in an emotionally charged context and under time constraints is a daily challenge for the oncology clinician, resulting often in cancer patients' dissatisfaction. Recent interventions elaborated to facilitate doctor-patient communication in oncology focus on patients, such as handing out of videos or written preparatory information; on doctors, such as patients' self-rating feedback to doctors or communication skills trainings; or on both, such as the audiotaping of the consultation or the provision of decision aids. Although these strategies offer promising results, further research should be implemented to assess their appropriateness across sociocultural contexts and their long-term effectiveness in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15933466     DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000167734.26454.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol        ISSN: 1040-8746            Impact factor:   3.645


  70 in total

1.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Patient satisfaction with care in office-based oncology practices.

Authors:  Walter Baumann; Alexandra Nonnenmacher; Bernd Weiss; Stephan Schmitz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  "Best practice" for patient-centered communication: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ann King; Ruth B Hoppe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

4.  Doctor-patient communication: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer Fong Ha; Nancy Longnecker
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2010

5.  [Communication preferences of patients with chronic back pain in medical rehabilitation].

Authors:  E Schmidt; L Gramm; E Farin
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  More Shared Responsibility for "More Appropriate Communication".

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Journal:  Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups       Date:  2018-04-27

7.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Patients' Perceptions of Physician-Patient Discussions and Adverse Events with Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Dawn Hershman; Elizabeth Calhoun; Kinga Zapert; Shawn Wade; Jennifer Malin; Rich Barron
Journal:  Arch Drug Inf       Date:  2008-09

9.  Physicians' knowledge of health-related quality of life and perception of its importance in daily clinical practice.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola; Rita Murri; Graziano Onder; Adriana Turriziani; Massimo Fantoni; Luca Padua
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Distribution and determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher G Lis; Mark Rodeghier; Digant Gupta
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.