Literature DB >> 15932996

Starvation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in anaerobic nitrogen- or carbon-limited chemostat cultures.

Elisabeth Thomsson1, Lena Gustafsson, Christer Larsson.   

Abstract

Anaerobic starvation conditions are frequent in industrial fermentation and can affect the performance of the cells. In this study, the anaerobic carbon or nitrogen starvation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was investigated for cells grown in anaerobic carbon or nitrogen-limited chemostat cultures at a dilution rate of 0.1 h(-1) at pH 3.25 or 5. Lactic or benzoic acid was present in the growth medium at different concentrations, resulting in 16 different growth conditions. At steady state, cells were harvested and then starved for either carbon or nitrogen for 24 h under anaerobic conditions. We measured fermentative capacity, glucose uptake capacity, intracellular ATP content, and reserve carbohydrates and found that the carbon, but not the nitrogen, starvation response was dependent upon the previous growth conditions. All cells subjected to nitrogen starvation retained a large portion of their initial fermentative capacity, independently of previous growth conditions. However, nitrogen-limited cells that were starved for carbon lost almost all their fermentative capacity, while carbon-limited cells managed to preserve a larger portion of their fermentative capacity during carbon starvation. There was a positive correlation between the amount of glycogen before carbon starvation and the fermentative capacity and ATP content of the cells after carbon starvation. Fermentative capacity and glucose uptake capacity were not correlated under any of the conditions tested. Thus, the successful adaptation to sudden carbon starvation requires energy and, under anaerobic conditions, fermentable endogenous resources. In an industrial setting, carbon starvation in anaerobic fermentations should be avoided to maintain a productive yeast population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932996      PMCID: PMC1151810          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3007-3013.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  23 in total

1.  Glucose starvation induces a drastic reduction in the rates of both transcription and degradation of mRNA in yeast.

Authors:  G Jona; M Choder; O Gileadi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2000-04-25

2.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent.

Authors:  O H LOWRY; N J ROSEBROUGH; A L FARR; R J RANDALL
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1951-11       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Physiological effects of nitrogen starvation in an anaerobic batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  U Schulze; G Lidén; J Nielsen; J Villadsen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  Trehalose reserve in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: phenomenon of transport, accumulation and role in cell viability.

Authors:  L Plourde-Owobi; S Durner; G Goma; J François
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 5.  Stress tolerance: the key to effective strains of industrial baker's yeast.

Authors:  P V Attfield
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Glycolytic flux is conditionally correlated with ATP concentration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a chemostat study under carbon- or nitrogen-limiting conditions.

Authors:  C Larsson; A Nilsson; A Blomberg; L Gustafsson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Affinity of glucose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is modulated during growth on glucose.

Authors:  M C Walsh; H P Smits; M Scholte; K van Dam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Function of trehalose and glycogen in cell cycle progression and cell viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H H Silljé; J W Paalman; E G ter Schure; S Q Olsthoorn; A J Verkleij; J Boonstra; C T Verrips
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the Yin and Yang of trehalose.

Authors:  M A Singer; S Lindquist
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 19.536

10.  Disruption of the yeast ATH1 gene confers better survival after dehydration, freezing, and ethanol shock: potential commercial applications.

Authors:  J Kim; P Alizadeh; T Harding; A Hefner-Gravink; D J Klionsky
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effect of nutrient starvation on the cellular composition and metabolic capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eva Albers; Christer Larsson; Thomas Andlid; Michael C Walsh; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  pH regulation in glycosomes of procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  Sheng Lin; Charles Voyton; Meredith T Morris; P Christine Ackroyd; James C Morris; Kenneth A Christensen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Unique properties of the Mtr4p-poly(A) complex suggest a role in substrate targeting.

Authors:  Jade Bernstein; Jeff D Ballin; Dimeka N Patterson; Gerald M Wilson; Eric A Toth
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Cellular Control of Viscosity Counters Changes in Temperature and Energy Availability.

Authors:  Laura B Persson; Vardhaan S Ambati; Onn Brandman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to different nitrogen concentrations during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  A Mendes-Ferreira; M del Olmo; J García-Martínez; E Jiménez-Martí; A Mendes-Faia; J E Pérez-Ortín; C Leão
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Serum-dependent selective expression of EhTMKB1-9, a member of Entamoeba histolytica B1 family of transmembrane kinases.

Authors:  Shiteshu Shrimal; Sudha Bhattacharya; Alok Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  Different selective pressures lead to different genomic outcomes as newly-formed hybrid yeasts evolve.

Authors:  Jeff S Piotrowski; Saisubramanian Nagarajan; Evgueny Kroll; Alison Stanbery; Kami E Chiotti; Arthur L Kruckeberg; Barbara Dunn; Gavin Sherlock; Frank Rosenzweig
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 8.  Copy Number Variation in Fungi and Its Implications for Wine Yeast Genetic Diversity and Adaptation.

Authors:  Jacob L Steenwyk; Antonis Rokas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The Monod Model Is Insufficient To Explain Biomass Growth in Nitrogen-Limited Yeast Fermentation.

Authors:  David Henriques; Eva Balsa-Canto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.792

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.