Literature DB >> 15932834

Extended use of transdermal norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol: a randomized trial.

Felicia H Stewart1, Andrew M Kaunitz, Katherine D Laguardia, Debra L Karvois, Alan C Fisher, Andrew J Friedman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare bleeding profiles and satisfaction among women using a norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol (E2) transdermal contraceptive patch in an extended regimen to those among women using a traditional 28-day patch regimen.
METHODS: Healthy, regularly menstruating women (N = 239) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch in an extended regimen (weekly application for 12 consecutive weeks, 1 patch-free week, and 3 more consecutive weekly applications, n = 158) or a cyclic regimen (4 consecutive cycles of 3 weekly applications and 1 patch-free week, n = 81). Subjects recorded bleeding data daily and completed satisfaction questionnaires. Subjects and investigators provided overall assessments of the regimens.
RESULTS: Extended use of the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch resulted in fewer median bleeding days (6 compared with 14, P < .001), bleeding episodes (1 compared with 3, P < .001), and bleeding or spotting episodes (2 compared with 3, P < .001) compared with cyclic use during days 1-84; median numbers of bleeding or spotting days were similar between regimens (14 compared with 16, P = .407) during this time. Extended use delayed median time to first bleeding to 54 days compared with 25 days with cyclic (P < .001). Subjects were highly satisfied with both regimens. Although not statistically significant, slightly more adverse events were reported with the extended than with the 28-day regimen.
CONCLUSION: Compared with cyclic use, extended use of the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch delayed menses and resulted in fewer bleeding days. This regimen may represent a useful alternative for women who prefer fewer episodes of withdrawal bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15932834     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000160430.61799.f6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Contraception in Canada: a review of method choices, characteristics, adherence and approaches to counselling.

Authors:  William A Fisher; Amanda Black
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Anne Lethaby; Michelle R Wise; Maria Aj Weterings; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-11

Review 3.  Continuous or extended cycle vs. cyclic use of combined hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Elizabeth Micks; Maria F Gallo; Jeffrey T Jensen; David A Grimes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-29

4.  Effect of the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch on body composition. Results of bioelectrical impedance analysis in a population of Italian women.

Authors:  Antonio Piccoli; PierGiorgio Crosignani; Carmine Nappi; Salvatore Ronsini; Vincenzina Bruni; Silvia Marelli
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 5.  Menstrual suppression: current perspectives.

Authors:  Paula Adams Hillard
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 6.  Unscheduled bleeding and contraceptive choice: increasing satisfaction and continuation rates.

Authors:  Jennifer Villavicencio; Rebecca H Allen
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-03-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.