BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend using absolute risk to inform clinical decisions in cardiovascular disease prevention. Absolute risk assessment tools have been disseminated to general practitioners, however current use and knowledge of this is approach among GPs is unknown. METHOD: Transcribed audiotapes of focus groups with 36 GPs, analysed for key themes. RESULTS: The GPs said absolute cardiovascular risk assessment tools were used largely as an aid to patient education rather than an influence on management, for which the concept was poorly understood. Barriers to their use included poor computer software, inconsistency with regulations over the use of lipid lowering agents, and fears patients would not understand the concepts. DISCUSSION: To encourage the implementation of absolute risk tools in cardiovascular disease prevention, and GP education. Attitudes and systematic barriers to their use by GPs need to be addressed.
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend using absolute risk to inform clinical decisions in cardiovascular disease prevention. Absolute risk assessment tools have been disseminated to general practitioners, however current use and knowledge of this is approach among GPs is unknown. METHOD: Transcribed audiotapes of focus groups with 36 GPs, analysed for key themes. RESULTS: The GPs said absolute cardiovascular risk assessment tools were used largely as an aid to patient education rather than an influence on management, for which the concept was poorly understood. Barriers to their use included poor computer software, inconsistency with regulations over the use of lipid lowering agents, and fears patients would not understand the concepts. DISCUSSION: To encourage the implementation of absolute risk tools in cardiovascular disease prevention, and GP education. Attitudes and systematic barriers to their use by GPs need to be addressed.
Authors: Chris Schilling; Duncan Mortimer; Kim Dalziel; Emma Heeley; John Chalmers; Philip Clarke Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Sophie Hill; Janet Spink; Dominique Cadilhac; Adrian Edwards; Caroline Kaufman; Sophie Rogers; Rebecca Ryan; Andrew Tonkin Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David Peiris; Tim Usherwood; Katie Panaretto; Mark Harris; Jenny Hunt; Bindu Patel; Nicholas Zwar; Julie Redfern; Stephen Macmahon; Stephen Colagiuri; Noel Hayman; Anushka Patel Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: David P Peiris; Rohina Joshi; Ruth J Webster; Patrick Groenestein; Tim P Usherwood; Emma Heeley; Fiona M Turnbull; Alexandra Lipman; Anushka A Patel Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 5.428