Literature DB >> 15930064

Quality improvement for depression in primary care: do patients with subthreshold depression benefit in the long run?

Kenneth Wells1, Cathy Sherbourne, Naihua Duan, Jürgen Unützer, Jeanne Miranda, Michael Schoenbaum, Susan L Ettner, Lisa S Meredith, Lisa Rubenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Quality improvement programs for depression can improve outcomes, but the utility of including patients with subthreshold depression in quality improvement programs is unclear. The authors examined 57-month effects of quality improvement on clinical outcomes and mental health care utilization of primary care patients with depressive disorder and subthreshold depression.
METHOD: In a group-level, randomized, controlled trial, 46 primary care clinics were randomly assigned to provide usual care or care with a quality improvement intervention that included provider training and other resources for either medication management (medications quality improvement) or evidence-based psychotherapy (therapy quality improvement). Among 1,356 enrolled depressed patients, 991 completed the 57-month follow-up interview (604 patients with depressive disorder and 387 with subthreshold depression). Outcomes measured at 57 months were presence of probable depressive disorder, unmet need for appropriate care (untreated probable disorder), and mental health care utilization in the prior 6 months.
RESULTS: Among patients with subthreshold depression at baseline, those seen in clinics with quality improvement programs with special resources for therapy were less likely to have probable depressive disorder and unmet need for care at follow-up, compared with those seen in clinics that provided usual care. Among patients with depressive disorder at baseline, those seen in clinics with quality improvement programs with special resources for medication management were less likely to have unmet need for care at follow-up, compared with those seen in clinics that provided usual care. Patients with subthreshold depression at baseline seen in clinics with a quality improvement intervention were less likely at follow-up to have had a mental health visit (in primary care or specialty care, depending on the intervention) in the prior 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative to usual care, quality improvement interventions improved 57-month outcomes (probable depression, unmet need, or both) for primary care patients with depressive disorder and subthreshold depression and lowered use of mental health visits for those with subthreshold depression. The results highlight the feasibility and utility of including patients with subthreshold depression in such programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15930064     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.6.1149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  28 in total

1.  Subjective versus objective: an exploratory analysis of latino primary care patients with self-perceived depression who do not fulfill primary care evaluation of mental disorders patient health questionnaire criteria for depression.

Authors:  Susan Caplan; Jennifer Alvidrez; Manuel Paris; Javier I Escobar; Jane K Dixon; Mayur M Desai; Robin Whittemore; Lawrence D Scahill
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2010

2.  Primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' approaches to treating mild depression.

Authors:  R E Lawrence; K A Rasinski; J D Yoon; K G Meador; H G Koenig; F A Curlin
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.392

3.  Are patient characteristics associated with quality of depression care and outcomes in collaborative care programs for depression?

Authors:  Amy M Bauer; Vanessa Azzone; Laurie Alexander; Howard H Goldman; Jürgen Unützer; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.238

4.  Effect of eliminating behavioral health benefits for selected medicaid enrollees.

Authors:  K John McConnell; Neal T Wallace; Charles A Gallia; Jeanene A Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Implementation of collaborative depression management at community-based primary care clinics: an evaluation.

Authors:  Amy M Bauer; Vanessa Azzone; Howard H Goldman; Laurie Alexander; Jürgen Unützer; Brenda Coleman-Beattie; Richard G Frank
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Patients' experiences of receiving collaborative care for the treatment of depression in the UK: a qualitative investigation.

Authors:  Angela Simpson; David Richards; Linda Gask; Susan Hennessy; Diane Escott
Journal:  Ment Health Fam Med       Date:  2008-06

7.  Training primary care staff to deliver a computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy program for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Raphael D Rose; Ariel J Lang; Stacy Shaw Welch; Laura Campbell-Sills; Denise A Chavira; Greer Sullivan; Cathy Sherbourne; Alexander Bystritsky; Murray B Stein; Peter P Roy-Byrne; Michelle G Craske
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Secondary prevention of suicide.

Authors:  Debora Ganz; M Dolores Braquehais; Leo Sher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Primary care evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) screening for minor depressive disorder in primary care.

Authors:  Marijo B Tamburrino; Denis J Lynch; Rollin W Nagel; Mary Kay Smith
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009

Review 10.  [Subdiagnostic depression. Are there treatments with clinically relevant effects?].

Authors:  U Hegerl; P Schönknecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.