Literature DB >> 15929500

Eyeblink conditioning in rats using pontine stimulation as a conditioned stimulus.

John H Freeman1, Christine A Rabinak.   

Abstract

Previous studies using rabbits and ferrets found that electrical stimulation of the pontine nuclei or middle cerebellar peduncle could serve as a conditioned stimulus (CS) in eyeblink conditioning (Bao, Chen, & Thompson, 2000; Hesslow, Svensson, & Ivarsson, 1999; Steinmetz, 1990; Steinmetz, Lavond, & Thompson, 1985; 1989; Steinmetz et al., 1986; Tracy, Thompson, Krupa, & Thompson, 1998). The current study used electrical stimulation of the pontine nuclei as a CS to establish eyeblink conditioning in rats. The goals of this study were to develop a method for directly activating the CS pathway in rodents and to compare the neural circuitry underlying eyeblink conditioning in different mammalian species. Rats were given electrical stimulation through a bipolar electrode implanted in the pontine nuclei paired with a periorbital shock unconditioned stimulus (US). Paired training was followed by extinction training. A subset of rats was given a test session of paired training after receiving an infusion of muscimol into the anterior interpositus nucleus. Rats given paired presentations of the stimulation CS and US developed CRs rapidly and showed extinction. Muscimol infusion prior to the test session resulted in a reversible loss of the eyeblink CR. The results demonstrate that electrical stimulation of the pontine nuclei can be used as a CS in rodents and that the CS pathway is similar in rats, rabbits, and ferrets. In addition, the loss of CRs following muscimol inactivation shows that the conditioning produced with pontine stimulation depends on cerebellar mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15929500      PMCID: PMC1249521          DOI: 10.1007/BF02734438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci        ISSN: 1053-881X


  39 in total

1.  Activity of deep cerebellar nuclear cells during classical conditioning of nictitating membrane extension in rabbits.

Authors:  N E Berthier; J W Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Classical conditioning in rabbits using pontine nucleus stimulation as a conditioned stimulus and inferior olive stimulation as an unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Bilateral cerebellar lesions disrupt conditioned eyelid responses in unrestrained rats.

Authors:  R W Skelton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus.

Authors:  M D Mauk; J E Steinmetz; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Initial localization of the acoustic conditioned stimulus projection system to the cerebellum essential for classical eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; C G Logan; D J Rosen; J K Thompson; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Neuronal responses of the rabbit cerebellum during acquisition and performance of a classically conditioned nictitating membrane-eyelid response.

Authors:  D A McCormick; R F Thompson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal specificity in cross-modal transfer of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  E J Kehoe; R M Napier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-01

8.  Classical conditioning of the rabbit eyelid response with a mossy-fiber stimulation CS: I. Pontine nuclei and middle cerebellar peduncle stimulation.

Authors:  J E Steinmetz; D J Rosen; P F Chapman; D G Lavond; R F Thompson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Dorsal accessory inferior olive activity diminishes during acquisition of the rabbit classically conditioned eyelid response.

Authors:  L L Sears; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Cerebellar Purkinje cell activity related to the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response.

Authors:  N E Berthier; J W Moore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  20 in total

1.  Pontine stimulation overcomes developmental limitations in the neural mechanisms of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Christine A Rabinak; Matthew M Campolattaro
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Medial auditory thalamic stimulation as a conditioned stimulus for eyeblink conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Classical eyeblink conditioning using electrical stimulation of caudal mPFC as conditioned stimulus is dependent on cerebellar interpositus nucleus in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Guang-yan Wu; Juan Yao; Zheng-li Fan; Lang-qian Zhang; Xuan Li; Chuang-dong Zhao; Zhen-hua Zhou; Jian-feng Sui
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Cerebellar and extracerebellar involvement in mouse eyeblink conditioning: the ACDC model.

Authors:  Henk-Jan Boele; Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.505

5.  Species-specific differences in the medial prefrontal projections to the pons between rat and rabbit.

Authors:  Maria V Moya; Jennifer J Siegel; Eedann D McCord; Brian E Kalmbach; Nikolai Dembrow; Daniel Johnston; Raymond A Chitwood
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Medial auditory thalamic nuclei are necessary for eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Evaluation of bidirectional interstimulus interval (ISI) shift in auditory delay eye-blink conditioning in healthy humans.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; Patrick D Skosnik; Chad R Edwards; Amanda R Bolbecker; Joseph E Steinmetz; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Ontogenetic change in the auditory conditioned stimulus pathway for eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Matthew M Campolattaro
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.460

9.  Medial auditory thalamic input to the lateral pontine nuclei is necessary for auditory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Medial auditory thalamus inactivation prevents acquisition and retention of eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Amy Poremba; John H Freeman
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.