Literature DB >> 15929088

New and fast statistical-thermodynamic method for computation of protein-ligand binding entropy substantially improves docking accuracy.

A M Ruvinsky1, A V Kozintsev.   

Abstract

We present a novel method to estimate the contributions of translational and rotational entropy to protein-ligand binding affinity. The method is based on estimates of the configurational integral through the sizes of clusters obtained from multiple docking positions. Cluster sizes are defined as the intervals of variation of center of ligand mass and Euler angles in the cluster. Then we suggest a method to consider the entropy of torsional motions. We validate the suggested methods on a set of 135 PDB protein-ligand complexes by comparing the averaged root-mean square deviations (RMSD) of the top-scored ligand docked positions, accounting and not accounting for entropy contributions, relative to the experimentally determined positions. We demonstrate that the method increases docking accuracy by 10-21% when used in conjunction with the AutoDock docking program, thus reducing the percent of incorrectly docked ligands by 1.4-fold to four-fold, so that in some cases the percent of ligands correctly docked to within an RMSD of 2 A is above 90%. We show that the suggested method to account for entropy of relative motions is identical to the method based on the Monte Carlo integration over intervals of variation of center of ligand mass and Euler angles in the cluster. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15929088     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  16 in total

1.  The ruggedness of protein-protein energy landscape and the cutoff for 1/r(n) potentials.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Efficient incorporation of protein flexibility and dynamics into molecular docking simulations.

Authors:  Markus A Lill
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016.

Authors:  Xavier Fradera; Andreas Verras; Yuan Hu; Deping Wang; Hongwu Wang; James I Fells; Kira A Armacost; Alejandro Crespo; Brad Sherborne; Huijun Wang; Zhengwei Peng; Ying-Duo Gao
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  PHOENIX: a scoring function for affinity prediction derived using high-resolution crystal structures and calorimetry measurements.

Authors:  Yat T Tang; Garland R Marshall
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Beyond picomolar affinities: quantitative aspects of noncovalent and covalent binding of drugs to proteins.

Authors:  Adam J T Smith; Xiyun Zhang; Andrew G Leach; K N Houk
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  Empirical entropic contributions in computational docking: evaluation in APS reductase complexes.

Authors:  Max W Chang; Richard K Belew; Kate S Carroll; Arthur J Olson; David S Goodsell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 7.  Binding of small-molecule ligands to proteins: "what you see" is not always "what you get".

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Configurational entropy in protein-peptide binding: computational study of Tsg101 ubiquitin E2 variant domain with an HIV-derived PTAP nonapeptide.

Authors:  Benjamin J Killian; Joslyn Yudenfreund Kravitz; Sandeep Somani; Paramita Dasgupta; Yuan-Ping Pang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Structure-activity relationship and comparative docking studies for cycloguanil analogs as PfDHFR-TS inhibitors.

Authors:  Prasanna Sivaprakasam; Perrer N Tosso; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.