Literature DB >> 28913710

Performance of multiple docking and refinement methods in the pose prediction D3R prospective Grand Challenge 2016.

Xavier Fradera1, Andreas Verras2, Yuan Hu3, Deping Wang4, Hongwu Wang3, James I Fells3, Kira A Armacost4, Alejandro Crespo3, Brad Sherborne3, Huijun Wang3, Zhengwei Peng3, Ying-Duo Gao3.   

Abstract

We describe the performance of multiple pose prediction methods for the D3R 2016 Grand Challenge. The pose prediction challenge includes 36 ligands, which represent 4 chemotypes and some miscellaneous structures against the FXR ligand binding domain. In this study we use a mix of fully automated methods as well as human-guided methods with considerations of both the challenge data and publicly available data. The methods include ensemble docking, colony entropy pose prediction, target selection by molecular similarity, molecular dynamics guided pose refinement, and pose selection by visual inspection. We evaluated the success of our predictions by method, chemotype, and relevance of publicly available data. For the overall data set, ensemble docking, visual inspection, and molecular dynamics guided pose prediction performed the best with overall mean RMSDs of 2.4, 2.2, and 2.2 Å respectively. For several individual challenge molecules, the best performing method is evaluated in light of that particular ligand. We also describe the protein, ligand, and public information data preparations that are typical of our binding mode prediction workflow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D3R Grand Challenge 2016; Docking; FXR; Molecular dynamics; Pose prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28913710     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-017-0053-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

5.  Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-02-01

6.  Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Exploring the stability of ligand binding modes to proteins by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Etsurou Watanabe; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  The holistic integration of virtual screening in drug discovery.

Authors:  Yusuf Tanrikulu; Björn Krüger; Ewgenij Proschak
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids.

Authors:  M Makishima; A Y Okamoto; J J Repa; H Tu; R M Learned; A Luk; M V Hull; K D Lustig; D J Mangelsdorf; B Shan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Identification of an N-oxide pyridine GW4064 analog as a potent FXR agonist.

Authors:  Song Feng; Minmin Yang; Zhenshan Zhang; Zhanguo Wang; Di Hong; Hans Richter; Gregory Martin Benson; Konrad Bleicher; Uwe Grether; Rainer E Martin; Jean-Marc Plancher; Bernd Kuhn; Markus Georg Rudolph; Li Chen
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.823

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sampling and refinement protocols for template-based macrocycle docking: 2018 D3R Grand Challenge 4.

Authors:  Sergei Kotelnikov; Andrey Alekseenko; Cong Liu; Mikhail Ignatov; Dzmitry Padhorny; Emiliano Brini; Mark Lukin; Evangelos Coutsias; Ken A Dill; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  D3R grand challenge 4: blind prediction of protein-ligand poses, affinity rankings, and relative binding free energies.

Authors:  Conor D Parks; Zied Gaieb; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Chenghua Shao; W Patrick Walters; Johanna M Jansen; Georgia McGaughey; Richard A Lewis; Scott D Bembenek; Michael K Ameriks; Tara Mirzadegan; Stephen K Burley; Rommie E Amaro; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.