Literature DB >> 15928911

Use of hip and knee clinical scoring systems in prosthesis surgery in Norwegian hospitals.

Knut Stavem1, Øyvind Arnesen.   

Abstract

In a postal survey of all orthopaedic surgery departments performing total hip or knee replacements in Norway, we inquired about the use of hip or knee scoring systems and their impact. All 63 eligible hospitals responded to the questionnaire. Thirteen (21%) reported routine use of hip clinical scoring systems, and five (9%) used knee clinical scoring systems. The Harris hip score and The Knee Society clinical rating system were the most prevalent. We received five different versions of the Harris hip score. The regional/university hospitals most commonly used clinical scoring systems. The adoption of clinical scoring systems did not differ with the annual procedure volumes of the hospitals.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928911      PMCID: PMC3456644          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0663-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

Review 1.  Rating systems for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Andrew P Davies
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties.

Authors:  L I Havelin; L B Engesaeter; B Espehaug; O Furnes; S A Lie; S E Vollset
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2000-08

3.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

Authors:  J Dawson; R Fitzpatrick; D Murray; A Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

5.  A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses.

Authors:  J N Insall; C S Ranawat; P Aglietti; J Shine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Reliability and validity of clinical outcome measurements of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Y Sun; T Stürmer; K P Günther; H Brenner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes.

Authors:  B G Drake; C M Callahan; R S Dittus; J G Wright
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment.

Authors:  N N Mahomed; D C Arndt; B J McGrory; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure.

Authors:  E M Roos; H P Roos; L S Lohmander; C Ekdahl; B D Beynnon
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.