W R Smith1. 1. Division of Quality Health Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To understand the theory and results of how to improve physician performance, as part of overall health-care quality improvement. In particular, to study whether and how guideline production and dissemination affects physician performance. DESIGN: Review of meta-analyses and structured reviews; review of behavior change theories implicit in interventions to change physician performance. SETTING: Primarily the United States. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Various patients and physicians, determined by reviews. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There is no unifying theory of physician behavior change tested among physicians in practice. Attempts to affect individual physicians' performance have often met with failure. Mixed results are found for almost all interventions reviewed. Multiple interventions yield better results. CONCLUSIONS: The answer to the question of what works to improve an individual physician's clinical performance is not simple. Emerging theory and evidence suggests that applications of behavior-change methods should not be focused on which tools (don't) always work. Instead, guideline development and implementation methods should be theory driven and evidence based (supported by evidence that proves the theory correct). In particular, the framework of evidence-based quality assessment offers some insight into past failures and offers hope for organizing attempts at guideline implementation.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To understand the theory and results of how to improve physician performance, as part of overall health-care quality improvement. In particular, to study whether and how guideline production and dissemination affects physician performance. DESIGN: Review of meta-analyses and structured reviews; review of behavior change theories implicit in interventions to change physician performance. SETTING: Primarily the United States. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Various patients and physicians, determined by reviews. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: There is no unifying theory of physician behavior change tested among physicians in practice. Attempts to affect individual physicians' performance have often met with failure. Mixed results are found for almost all interventions reviewed. Multiple interventions yield better results. CONCLUSIONS: The answer to the question of what works to improve an individual physician's clinical performance is not simple. Emerging theory and evidence suggests that applications of behavior-change methods should not be focused on which tools (don't) always work. Instead, guideline development and implementation methods should be theory driven and evidence based (supported by evidence that proves the theory correct). In particular, the framework of evidence-based quality assessment offers some insight into past failures and offers hope for organizing attempts at guideline implementation.
Authors: Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Andrea Cook; Stephen A Feig; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Gail V Berkenblit; James M Sosman; Michael Bass; Hirut T Gebrekristos; Joseph Cofrancesco; Lynn E Sullivan; Robert L Cook; Marcia Edison; Philip G Bashook; P Todd Korthuis Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nelangi M Pinto; Kevin A Henry; William A Grobman; Amen Ness; Stephen Miller; Sarah Ellestad; Nina Gotteiner; Theresa Tacy; Guo Wei; L LuAnn Minich; Anita Y Kinney Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2019-12-24 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Roald Gerritsen; Hans Faddegon; Fred Dijkers; Kees van Grootheest; Eugène van Puijenbroek Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Jade E Bilardi; Christopher K Fairley; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Marie V Pirotta; Kathleen M McNamee; Siobhan Bourke; Lyle C Gurrin; Margaret Hellard; Lena A Sanci; Michelle J Wills; Jennifer Walker; Marcus Y Chen; Jane S Hocking Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-17 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Clio Spanou; Sharon A Simpson; Kerry Hood; Adrian Edwards; David Cohen; Stephen Rollnick; Ben Carter; Jim McCambridge; Laurence Moore; Elizabeth Randell; Timothy Pickles; Christine Smith; Claire Lane; Fiona Wood; Hazel Thornton; Chris C Butler Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.497