Literature DB >> 15928554

The effect of pedicle screw placement with or without application of compression across the neurocentral cartilage on the morphology of the spinal canal and pedicle in immature pigs.

Akin Cil1, Muharrem Yazici, Kenan Daglioglu, Ustun Aydingoz, Ahmet Alanay, R Emre Acaroglu, Mahir Gulsen, Adil Surat.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental study.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of pedicle screw insertion on spinal canal and pedicle morphology in immature pigs, and, if transpedicular fixation has an effect, to document whether this occurs because of the inhabitance of the screw inside the growth plate (neurocentral cartilage [NCC]) or because of compression applied across the NCC. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transpedicular fixation has been less commonly applied to the pediatric population, especially because of the risk of damage to the NCC.
METHODS: Twelve newborn pigs (4-6 weeks of age) were operated on. Left sided pedicles from L1-L5 were studied, while right sides served as controls. Pigs were randomly assigned into 3 groups: (1) pedicles were probed only; (2) screws were inserted; and (3) after screw insertion, a washer and a nut were engaged at the pedicle entry point so that gradual compression across the NCC was achieved. After 4 months, spiral computerized tomography was used to measure the pedicle lengths and size of the halves of the spinal canal.
RESULTS: In group 1, the operated hemi-canal area was not statistically different from the nonoperated side (P = 0.159). Pedicle screw insertion either with (P = 0.007) or without (P = 0.005) compression resulted in smaller hemi-canal area and shorter pedicles at the operated side, respectively (P = 0.008, P = 0.021). Approximately 4% to 9% shortening of the pedicle lengths and 20% to 26% narrowing of the hemi-canal areas on the instrumented side occurred with transpedicular instrumentation (groups 2, 3).
CONCLUSION: Even without compression, pedicle screws passing through the NCC in immature pigs disturb spinal canal growth significantly. Clinical relevance for young children should be studied further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928554     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164136.95885.e7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

1.  Distractional failure forces comparison of different anchor sites for the pediatric growing rod technique.

Authors:  Zi Fang Huang; Jun Ouyang; Shi Zhen Zhong; Jun Lin Yang; Wei Dong Zhao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety pedicle parameter measurement of the Chinese immature thoracic spine.

Authors:  Changkun Zheng; Qishan Huang; Yuezheng Hu; Xiangyang Wang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Osseointegration improves bone-implant interface of pedicle screws in the growing spine: a biomechanical and histological study using an in vivo immature porcine model.

Authors:  Kanako Shiba; Hiroshi Taneichi; Takashi Namikawa; Satoshi Inami; Daisaku Takeuchi; Yutaka Nohara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Convex instrumented hemiepiphysiodesis with concave distraction: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ahmet Alanay; Ozgur Dede; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Prospective study of the effect of pedicle screw placement on development of the immature vertebra in an in vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Tamás Fülöp Fekete; Frank S Kleinstück; Anne F Mannion; Zsolt S Kendik; Dezso J Jeszenszky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical management of post-SCIWORA spinal deformities in children.

Authors:  Nadir Yalcin; Ozgur Dede; Ahmet Alanay; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Does addition of crosslink to pedicle-screw-based instrumentation impact the development of the spinal canal in children younger than 5 years of age?

Authors:  Zhong-hui Chen; Xi Chen; Ze-zhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Bang-ping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Neurocentral synchondrosis screws to create and correct experimental deformity: a pilot study.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Does pedicle screw fixation under age 5 cause spinal canal narrowing? A CT study with minimum 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Sinan Kahraman; Selhan Karadereler; Mutlu Cobanoglu; Sinan Yilar; Ayhan Mutlu; Levent Onur Ulusoy; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  X-Ray assessment of the effect of pedicle screw on vertebra and spinal canal growth in children before the age of 7 years.

Authors:  Xuhong Xue; Jianxiong Shen; Jianguo Zhang; Shugang Li; Yipeng Wang; Guixing Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.