Literature DB >> 15928550

The use of an interspinous implant in conjunction with a graded facetectomy procedure.

Paul D Fuchs1, Derek P Lindsey, Ken Y Hsu, James F Zucherman, Scott A Yerby.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The range of motion (ROM) of lumbar cadaver spines was measured during flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending following graded facetectomies and implantation of an X STOP interspinous spacer implant.
OBJECTIVE: The study was performed undertaken to understand better the influence of the interspinous spacer implant on the kinematics of the lumbar spine following graded facetectomies. SUMMARY OF THE BACKGROUND DATA: Lateral lumbar spinal stenosis is often treated with a unilateral or bilateral facetectomy procedure. Previous biomechanical research has shown that a facetectomy may increase the ROM during flexion and axial rotation.
METHODS: Seven cadaver spines (L2-L5) were tested in flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending, and the individual ROM of each motion segment was measured. Specimens were tested intact and following 3 graded facetectomies (i.e., unilateral medial facetectomy [UMF], unilateral total facetectomy [UTF], and bilateral total facetectomy [BTF]), with and without the X STOP.
RESULTS: A BTF caused a significant increase in ROM during flexion and axial rotation but not extension and lateral bending. The UMF and UTF did not affect the ROM during any of the 4 motions. The interspinous implant: (1) significantly decreased the flexion ROM for the intact, UMF, UTF, and BTF treatments; (2) significantly decreased the extension ROM for the intact, UMF, and BTF treatments but not the UTF (P < 0.13); (3) had no significant effect on the axial rotation ROM; and (4) significantly increased the lateral bending ROM for the UMF, UTF, and BTF treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the implant may be used in conjunction with a UMF or UTF. However, the X STOP should not be used in conjunction with BTF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928550     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164152.32734.d2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  [Interspinous implant "InSWing®" for the lumbar spine].

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christoph Schilling; M Pfeiffer; T M Grupp; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain.

Authors:  Mario Cabraja; Alexander Abbushi; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome?

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Klaus Schlüter-Brust; Thomas Kaulhausen; Marc Röllinghoff; Britta Joswig; Hartmut Stützer; Peer Eysel; Patrick Simons; Johannes Kuchta
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Letter to the Editor concerning "A less invasive surgical approach in the lumbar lateral recess stenosis: direct approach to the medial wall of the pedicle" by A. Colak et al. (2008) Eur Spine J;17:1745-51.

Authors:  Hua Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Christof Hurschler; Marcel Haversath; Ulf Liljenqvist; Viola Bullmann; Timm J Filler; Nani Osada; Eva-Maria Fallenberg; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex).

Authors:  Cong Xu; Wen-Fei Ni; Nai-Feng Tian; Xu-Qi Hu; Fan Li; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; U Onder; A Martin; A von Strempel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Stefano Marcia; Amedeo Taglieri; Antonio Chiaravalloti; Eros Calabria; Mario Raguso; Emanuele Piras; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with microdecompression and interspinous distraction device insertion. A case series.

Authors:  Avraam Ploumis; Pavlos Christodoulou; Dimitrios Kapoutsis; Ioannis Gelalis; Vasilios Vraggalas; Alexander Beris
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.