Literature DB >> 15926933

Cortical and subcortical contributions to saccade latency in the human brain.

S F W Neggers1, M A H Raemaekers, E E L Lampmann, A Postma, N F Ramsey.   

Abstract

An important property of our motor system is the ability to either perform or inhibit an automatic goal-directed reaction. Imagine, for example, how easily we can catch a ball, while at the same time we would never grasp a stinging insect approaching us. The oculomotor system provides a good model to study this ability. Monkey midbrain superior colliculus neurons are responsible for automatic visually evoked saccades, whereas the frontal eye fields can prevent reflexive glances. Little is known about human superior colliculus or the competition between the midbrain and frontal areas controlling saccades. In the present functional magnetic resonance study we used the gap paradigm, where a stimulus fixated with the eyes is removed 200 ms prior to saccade target onset. Subjects were required to either look at the target or prevent an eye movement. From what is known from non-human primate neurophysiology, it is expected that the gap will result in enlarged neuronal activity in the human superior colliculus, disinhibiting the oculomotor system and enhancing automatic reactions. Importantly, we demonstrate that the human superior colliculus homologue is indeed activated by the removal of a fixation target, in either task. The frontal eye fields show a reverse pattern when saccades were suppressed. Furthermore, magnitude of responses in the superior colliculus correlated negatively with saccade latency, and in the frontal eye fields positively. These findings confirm for the first time that the human superior colliculus generates automatic goal-directed saccades, whereas the frontal eye fields can exert volitional control over automatic orienting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15926933     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  13 in total

1.  Event-related potentials before saccades and antisaccades and their relation to reaction time.

Authors:  Marianna Papadopoulou; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Evangelos Tsoukas; Asimakis Mantas; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  This is the rhythm of your eyes: the phase of ongoing electroencephalogram oscillations modulates saccadic reaction time.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A step towards non-invasive characterization of the human frontal eye fields of individual subjects.

Authors:  Andreas A Ioannides; Peter Bc Fenwick; Elina Pitri; Lichan Liu
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03

4.  Human fronto-tectal and fronto-striatal-tectal pathways activate differently during anti-saccades.

Authors:  Antoin D de Weijer; Rene C W Mandl; Iris E C Sommer; Matthijs Vink; Rene S Kahn; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and volitional saccades: evidence from studies of humans.

Authors:  Jennifer E McDowell; Kara A Dyckman; Benjamin P Austin; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  A functional and structural investigation of the human fronto-basal volitional saccade network.

Authors:  Sebastiaan F W Neggers; Rosanne M van Diepen; Bram B Zandbelt; Matthijs Vink; René C W Mandl; Tjerk P Gutteling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distributed representations of the "preparatory set" in the frontal oculomotor system: a TMS study.

Authors:  M Nagel; A Sprenger; R Lencer; D Kömpf; H Siebner; W Heide
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Louisa V Kulke; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  The human frontal oculomotor cortical areas contribute asymmetrically to motor planning in a gap saccade task.

Authors:  Paul van Donkelaar; Yu Lin; David Hewlett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sequential activation of human oculomotor centers during planning of visually-guided eye movements: a combined fMRI-MEG study.

Authors:  Carlo Sestieri; Vittorio Pizzella; Francesco Cianflone; Gian Luca Romani; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.