D Behera1, T Balamugesh. 1. Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Tobacco smoking is the most common risk factor for lung cancer. But a significant proportion of lung cancer occurs in non-smokers. Indoor pollution due to domestic fuels has been recently implicated as a causative agent in lung cancer especially in women. We conducted a case control study to find out the role of indoor air pollution due to domestic cooking fuels in Indian women. METHODS: In a case control study 67 women with proven lung cancer were recruited. Forty-six females having a non-malignant respiratory disease constituted the control group. The patients and controls were asked about the exposure in various cooking fuels using a questionnaire. RESULT: There were 50 (74.6%) non-smokers and 17 (25.4%) smokers among the female cancer cases (p = 0.016). Adenocarcinoma was the commonest histological type of malignancy (n = 26, 38.8%) in the whole group and was the predominant form in the nonsmoking females. Tobacco smoking was the most important risk factor for lung cancer with OR of 4.87 (95% CI 1.34-17.76). Among non-smokers out of all the cooking fuels the risk of development of lung cancer was highest for biomass fuel exposure with an odds ratio of 5.33 (95% CI 1.7-16.7). Use of mixed fuels was associated with a lesser risk (OR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.1-8.38). ). In multivariate logistic regression analysis biomass fuel exposure was still significant with OR of 3.59 (95% CI 1.07-11.97) even after adjusting for smoking and passive smoking. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that biomass fuel exposure is an important risk factor in the causation of lung cancer among women in addition of exposure to tobacco smoke.
OBJECTIVES:Tobacco smoking is the most common risk factor for lung cancer. But a significant proportion of lung cancer occurs in non-smokers. Indoor pollution due to domestic fuels has been recently implicated as a causative agent in lung cancer especially in women. We conducted a case control study to find out the role of indoor air pollution due to domestic cooking fuels in Indian women. METHODS: In a case control study 67 women with proven lung cancer were recruited. Forty-six females having a non-malignant respiratory disease constituted the control group. The patients and controls were asked about the exposure in various cooking fuels using a questionnaire. RESULT: There were 50 (74.6%) non-smokers and 17 (25.4%) smokers among the female cancer cases (p = 0.016). Adenocarcinoma was the commonest histological type of malignancy (n = 26, 38.8%) in the whole group and was the predominant form in the nonsmoking females. Tobacco smoking was the most important risk factor for lung cancer with OR of 4.87 (95% CI 1.34-17.76). Among non-smokers out of all the cooking fuels the risk of development of lung cancer was highest for biomass fuel exposure with an odds ratio of 5.33 (95% CI 1.7-16.7). Use of mixed fuels was associated with a lesser risk (OR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.1-8.38). ). In multivariate logistic regression analysis biomass fuel exposure was still significant with OR of 3.59 (95% CI 1.07-11.97) even after adjusting for smoking and passive smoking. CONCLUSION: This study indicated that biomass fuel exposure is an important risk factor in the causation of lung cancer among women in addition of exposure to tobacco smoke.
Authors: H Dean Hosgood; Hu Wei; Amir Sapkota; Imran Choudhury; Nigel Bruce; Kirk R Smith; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2011-01-28 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Kevin Mortimer; Stephen B Gordon; Surinder K Jindal; Roberto A Accinelli; John Balmes; William J Martin Journal: Chest Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: D G Fullerton; S Semple; F Kalambo; A Suseno; R Malamba; G Henderson; J G Ayres; S B Gordon Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Britt C Reid; Armen A Ghazarian; David M DeMarini; Amir Sapkota; Darby Jack; Qing Lan; Deborah M Winn; Linda S Birnbaum Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 9.031