Literature DB >> 15925573

The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production.

William S Horton1, Richard J Gerrig.   

Abstract

Speakers often tailor their utterances to the needs of particular addressees--a process called audience design. We argue that important aspects of audience design can be understood as emergent features of ordinary memory processes. This perspective contrasts with earlier views that presume special processes or representations. To support our account, we present a study in which Directors engaged in a referential communication task with two independent Matchers. Over several rounds, the Directors instructed the Matchers how to arrange a set of picture cards. For half the triads, the Directors' card categories were initially distributed orthogonally by Matcher (e.g. Directors described birds and dogs with one Matcher and fish and frogs with the other). For the other triads, the Directors' card categories initially overlapped across Matchers (e.g. Directors described two members of each category with each Matcher). We predicted that the orthogonal configuration would more readily allow Directors to encode associations between particular cards and particular Matchers--and thus allow those Directors to provide more evidence for audience design. Content analyses of Directors' utterances from two final rounds supported our prediction. We suggest that audience design depends on the memory representations to which speakers have ready access given the time constraints of routine conversation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15925573     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  39 in total

1.  Ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage does not impair the development and use of common ground in social interaction: implications for cognitive theory of mind.

Authors:  Rupa Gupta; Daniel Tranel; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  How do I remember that I know you know that I know?

Authors:  Rachael D Rubin; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Melissa C Duff; Daniel Tranel; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-11-28

3.  Auditory presentation leads to better analogical retrieval than written presentation.

Authors:  Arthur B Markman; Eric Taylor; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

4.  A new experimental paradigm to study children's processing of their parent's unscripted language input.

Authors:  Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  The influence of partner-specific memory associations on language production: Evidence from picture naming.

Authors:  William S Horton
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2007

6.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts.

Authors:  Jennifer Arnold; Zenzi M Griffin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Anticipating who will say what: the influence of speaker-specific memory associations on reference resolution.

Authors:  William S Horton; Daniel G Slaten
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

8.  When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Tali Ditman; Arim Choi Perrachione
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-28

9.  What's learned together stays together: speakers' choice of referring expression reflects shared experience.

Authors:  Kristen S Gorman; Whitney Gegg-Harrison; Chelsea R Marsh; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Speaker-external versus speaker-internal forces on utterance form: do cognitive demands override threats to referential success?

Authors:  Liane Wardlow Lane; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.