Literature DB >> 15925204

Rippled-spectrum resolution dependence on masker-to-probe ratio.

Alexander Ya Supin1, Vladimir V Popov, Olga N Milekhina, Mikhail B Tarakanov.   

Abstract

Resolution of rippled sound spectrum (probe) in the presence of additional noise band (masker) was studied as a function of masker-to-probe ratio and sound level in normal listeners. The probe bands were 0.5-oct wide (ERB) centered at 2 kHz; the masker band either coincided with the probe (on-frequency masker), or was 3/4 octaves below (low-frequency masker), or 3/4 octaves above the probe (high-frequency masker). Ripple-density resolution in the probe band was measured by finding the highest ripple density at which an interchange of ripple peaks and valleys was detectable (the phase-reversal test). (i) The effect of the low-frequency masker increased (resolution decreased) when masker-to-probe ratio changed from -25 dB to +20 dB; the effect increased (resolution decreased) with sound level increase. (ii) The effect of the on-frequency masker steeply increased (resolution abruptly decreased) when masker-to-probe ratio exceeded 0 dB; the effect was little dependent on sound level. (iii) The high-frequency masker was little effective unless the masker-to-probe ratio reached 30-40 dB; the effect increased (resolution decreased) with sound level decrease. Thus, different position of the masker band relative to the probe resulted in qualitatively different kinds of spectrum-pattern resolution dependence on both the masker-to-probe ratio and sound level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15925204     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Discrimination of the spectral structure of sound signals under the conditions of dichotic release from interfering noise.

Authors:  A Ya Supin; V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

2.  Discrimination of the spectral structures of sound signals on the background of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-08

3.  Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-21

4.  Compressive nonlinearity of human hearing in sound spectra discrimination.

Authors:  O N Milekhina; D I Nechaev; A Ya Supin
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-13

5.  High Ripple-Density Resolution for Discriminating Between Rippled and Nonrippled Signals: Effect of Temporal Processing or Combination Products?

Authors:  Dmitry I Nechaev; Olga N Milekhina; Marina S Tomozova; Alexander Y Supin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Hearing Sensitivity to Shifts of Rippled-Spectrum Sound Signals in Masking Noise.

Authors:  Dmitry I Nechaev; Olga N Milekhina; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Auditory sensitivity to spectral modulation phase reversal as a function of modulation depth.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John Grose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Discrimination of rippled-spectrum patterns in noise: A manifestation of compressive nonlinearity.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Vladimir O Klishin; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spectrum Resolving Power of Hearing: Measurements, Baselines, and Influence of Maskers.

Authors:  Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-06-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.