Literature DB >> 15923812

Relationship quality: effects on ambulatory blood pressure and negative affect in a biracial sample of men and women.

Karen M Grewen1, Susan S Girdler, Kathleen C Light.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies link marriage to better cardiovascular health, but marital dissatisfaction and discord predict increased rates of hypertension, higher blood pressure (BP), greater reactivity to stress, and left ventricular mass.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare effects of partner status and relationship quality on 24-h BP, urinary norepinephrine and cortisol, and self-reported stress and negative affect.
METHODS: Ambulatory BP (ABP) and 24-h urine collections were obtained during a typical work day in 325 adults, including 139 African Americans (AAs). Participants cohabiting with a spouse or partner were classified into high, intermediate and low relationship quality (RQ) groups and compared to those without partners (Alone).
RESULTS: Mean ABP was nearly identical in participants with versus without partners (125.7/76.9 versus 125.9/76.7 mmHg). High RQ subjects had lower mean waking ABP than intermediate/low RQ and Alone groups [systolic blood pressure (SBP), F=3.45; diastolic blood pressure (DBP), F=3.38, P-values <0.05]. High RQ was related to lower SBP and DBP in African Americans, and to lower SBP in Whites. High RQ was also linked to lower SBP and DBP in men, and to lower SBP in women. High RQ subjects reported less negative affect and stress than all other groups (P<0.05). Norepinephrine was lower in partnered versus Alone women regardless of RQ status.
CONCLUSIONS: Relationship quality is a better predictor of daily BP, affect and stress than partner status. High RQ is linked to lower ABP across race and gender. This reduced ABP may be due, in part, to the stress buffering effects of better RQ and/or the stress enhancing effects of poor RQ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15923812     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200506000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  9 in total

1.  Bringing close others to the emergency department for an acute coronary event is associated with increased patient perception of threat.

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Laura Meli; Katherine R Thorson; Bernard P Chang; Donald Edmondson; Tessa V West
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.238

Review 2.  Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Theodore F Robles; Richard B Slatcher; Joseph M Trombello; Meghan M McGinn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Chronic psychosocial stress and hypertension.

Authors:  Tanya M Spruill
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Do any kinds of perceived stressors lead to hypertension? A longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Hamidreza Roohafza; Niloofar Sattari; Fatemeh Nouri; Mohammad Talaei; Gholamreza Masoumi; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Masoumeh Sadeghi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Risk Factors for Low Pharmacy Refill Adherence Among Older Hypertensive Men and Women by Race.

Authors:  LaKeisha G Williams; Erin Peacock; Cara Joyce; Lydia A Bazzano; Daniel Sarpong; Paul K Whelton; Elizabeth W Holt; Richard Re; Edward Frohlich; Jiang He; Paul Muntner; Marie Krousel-Wood
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Romantic Relationship Satisfaction and Ambulatory Blood Pressure During Social Interactions: Specificity or Spillover Effects?

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Jeffrey L Birk; Donald Edmondson; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Enemies and friends in high-tech places: the development and validation of the Online Social Experiences Measure.

Authors:  Robert G Kent de Grey; Bert N Uchino; Brian Rw Baucom; Timothy W Smith; Avery E Holton; Edward F Diener
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2019-09-23

8.  Examination of Several Physiological and Psychosocial Factors Potentially Associated With Masked Hypertension Among Low-Risk Adults.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Feng-Chang Lin; Laura A Tuttle; Emily Olsson; Susan S Girdler; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Response to Romantic Partner Interactions and Long-Term Cardiovascular Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Talea Cornelius; Jeffrey L Birk; Donald Edmondson; Joseph E Schwartz
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.864

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.