Literature DB >> 1592381

Reproducibility of mitosis counting in 2,469 breast cancer specimens: results from the Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project.

P J van Diest1, J P Baak, P Matze-Cok, E C Wisse-Brekelmans, C M van Galen, P H Kurver, S M Bellot, J Fijnheer, L H van Gorp, W S Kwee.   

Abstract

The Multicenter Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project is a prospective study on the reproducibility and prognostic value of routine quantitative assessments, especially the mitotic activity index (MAI), the multivariate prognostic index (MPI; a combination of MAI, tumor size, and lymph node status), the mean nuclear area, and DNA ploidy assessments in patients with invasive breast cancer. Fourteen pathology laboratories providing routine services to 35 hospitals throughout The Netherlands are participating in this project. In this article, the reproducibility of MAI and MPI assessments is described. Assessment of the MAI was, according to a strict protocol, first performed in the participating laboratories; thereafter, slides were transferred to the coordination center in Amsterdam for quality control. Analysis of the reproducibility of the assessments in 2,469 patients showed correlation coefficients between 0.81 and 0.96 (mean, 0.91) for the MAI and between 0.91 and 0.97 (mean, 0.96) for the MPI. The reproducibility was fairly constant in time, although it showed a slight drop in the middle of the 2-year intake period. A prognostically relevant discrepancy in MPI (caused by differences in MAI) between the original and quality control assessments was found in only 7.2% of the cases. When analyzing the reasons for these discrepancies, a plausible explanation could be found in all cases: bad tissue processing and ignorance of or negligence in following the protocol guidelines for selection of the counting area or in the process of counting were the most important flaws. Since these errors are largely controllable, an even lower discrepancy rate is theoretically achievable. In conclusion, in a routine setting it can be learned, within a reasonable time, to perform mitosis counting in a highly reproducible way if a strict protocol is carefully followed. This opens the way for a wider application of the MAI and MPI in breast cancer patients. Motivation is, however, an important factor to obtain reproducible results, and ongoing quality control is essential to guarantee the reproducibility of the assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1592381     DOI: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90313-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  70 in total

Review 1.  Proliferation markers in tumours: interpretation and clinical value.

Authors:  P J van Diest; G Brugal; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Breast cancer prognostication in the 21st century and the Nottingham prognostic index.

Authors:  T J Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Comparison of Ki-67 equivalent antibodies.

Authors:  C F Lindboe; S H Torp
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Demystified...tissue microarray technology.

Authors:  J Packeisen; E Korsching; H Herbst; W Boecker; H Buerger
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-08

5.  Better see to better agree: phosphohistone H3 increases interobserver agreement in mitotic count for meningioma grading and imposes new specific thresholds.

Authors:  Eleonora Duregon; Adele Cassenti; Alessandra Pittaro; Laura Ventura; Rebecca Senetta; Roberta Rudà; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Preinvasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Dennis C Sgroi
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.472

7.  High temperature antigen retrieval and loss of nuclear morphology: a comparison of microwave and autoclave techniques.

Authors:  N C Hunt; R Attanoos; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Immunophenotypic features of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from mammary carcinomas in female dogs associated with prognostic factors and survival rates.

Authors:  Alessandra Estrela-Lima; Márcio S S Araújo; João M Costa-Neto; Andréa Teixeira-Carvalho; Stella M Barrouin-Melo; Sergio V Cardoso; Olindo A Martins-Filho; Rogéria Serakides; Geovanni D Cassali
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Lympho-vascular invasion in BRCA related breast cancer compared to sporadic controls.

Authors:  Marise R Heerma van Voss; Petra van der Groep; Jos Bart; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Expression of BNIP3 in invasive breast cancer: correlations with the hypoxic response and clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Esther A Koop; Theo van Laar; Dick F van Wichen; Roel A de Weger; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.