Literature DB >> 15923794

A phase II study of alternating cycles of split course radiation therapy and gemcitabine chemotherapy for inoperable pancreatic or biliary tract carcinoma.

Lilie L Lin1, Joel Picus, J A Drebin, David C Linehan, Juan Solis, Steven M Strasberg, Benjamin Tan, Wade L Thorstad, Robert Myerson.   

Abstract

Because of increased toxicity, full doses of gemcitabine and radiation therapy cannot routinely be given concurrently. The purpose of the present study was to determine the toxicity and response to treatment with full-dose gemcitabine given between cycles of split-course radiation therapy (nonconcurrent treatment) for inoperable periampullary adenocarcinoma. Treatment consisted of 3 6 week courses for a total of 18 weeks: 1000 mg/m gemcitabine intravenous bolus once a week x 2 weeks; 1 week break; 2 weeks of radiation therapy (1.8 Gy per fraction); 1 week break x 3. The total dose of radiation consisted of 45 Gy to the tumor + regional nodes followed by a 5.4-Gy boost. Patients were restaged at week 15 and at the completion of all treatment. Patients underwent resection if there was sufficient response. A total of 42 patients (40 pancreatic, 1 gallbladder, 1 biliary tract) were enrolled between March 1999 and July 2002. All but 2 medically inoperable patients had evidence of major vessel involvement. Median age was 63 years (range, 40-80 years). All patients were evaluable for response. There were 10 objective partial responses (24%). Six responders underwent resection with a mean survival of 18 months. Mean survival for all 42 patients was 10.3 months (range, 2.0-32.5 months; median, 9.5 months). Four patients experienced grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. Alternating cycles of split-course radiotherapy and gemcitabine chemotherapy permits the delivery of full doses of both modalities with acceptable tolerance. Despite the prolongation in radiation treatment time because of split-course treatment, patients with sufficient response were able to undergo resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15923794     DOI: 10.1097/01.coc.0000156920.11091.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  6 in total

1.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: hepatobiliary cancers.

Authors:  Al B Benson; Thomas A Abrams; Edgar Ben-Josef; P Mark Bloomston; Jean F Botha; Bryan M Clary; Anne Covey; Steven A Curley; Michael I D'Angelica; Rene Davila; William D Ensminger; John F Gibbs; Daniel Laheru; Mokenge P Malafa; Jorge Marrero; Steven G Meranze; Sean J Mulvihill; James O Park; James A Posey; Jasgit Sachdev; Riad Salem; Elin R Sigurdson; Constantinos Sofocleous; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Alan P Venook; Laura Williams Goff; Yun Yen; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of phase II trials.

Authors:  M Mura Assifi; Xuyang Lu; Guido Eibl; Howard A Reber; Gang Li; O Joe Hines
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Staging, Treatment, and Future Approaches of Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Shukla; Govind Singh; K S Shahi; Prabhat Pant
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-03

4.  Postoperative recurrent patterns of gallbladder cancer: possible implications for adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Zhijun Yuan; Yongjie Shui; Lihong Liu; Yinglu Guo; Qichun Wei
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.309

5.  The relation between deoxycytidine kinase activity and the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine in eight different human tumour cell lines.

Authors:  Bea Pauwels; Annelies E C Korst; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Juliette A E Kamphuis; Christel M J De Pooter; Godefridus J Peters; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer: A Markov decision analysis.

Authors:  Alison Bradley; Robert Van Der Meer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.