BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment has proven beneficial for many gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, but no phase III trials have been completed examining this approach in pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis examines the best available phase II trials using neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Phase II trials were identified using a MEDLINE search, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1960 to July 2010. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Patients with initially resectable tumors (group A), and patients with borderline/unresectable tumors (group B). Primary outcome measures were rate of resection and survival. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 phase II clinical trials including 536 patients were analyzed. After treatment, resectability was 65.8% (95% CI, 55.4-75.6%) compared with 31.6% in group B (95% CI, 14.0-52.5%). A partial response was observed in patients with borderline/unresectable tumors; 31.8 (95% CI, 24.2-39.8%) in group B and 9.5% (95% CI, 2.9-19.4%) in group A (P = .003). Progressive disease was seen in 17.0% (95% CI, 11.9-22.7) of patients in group A versus 21.8% (95% CI, 10.1-36.5%) in group B (P = .006). Median survival in resected patients was 23 months for group A and 22 months for group B. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment seems to have some activity in patients with borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nearly one third of tumors initially deemed marginal for operative intervention were able to be ultimately resected after treatment. Until more effective targeted chemotherapeutics are developed, the only group of patients with pancreatic cancer that may benefit from neoadjuvant treatment are those with locally advanced disease.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant treatment has proven beneficial for many gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, but no phase III trials have been completed examining this approach in pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis examines the best available phase II trials using neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Phase II trials were identified using a MEDLINE search, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1960 to July 2010. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Patients with initially resectable tumors (group A), and patients with borderline/unresectable tumors (group B). Primary outcome measures were rate of resection and survival. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 phase II clinical trials including 536 patients were analyzed. After treatment, resectability was 65.8% (95% CI, 55.4-75.6%) compared with 31.6% in group B (95% CI, 14.0-52.5%). A partial response was observed in patients with borderline/unresectable tumors; 31.8 (95% CI, 24.2-39.8%) in group B and 9.5% (95% CI, 2.9-19.4%) in group A (P = .003). Progressive disease was seen in 17.0% (95% CI, 11.9-22.7) of patients in group A versus 21.8% (95% CI, 10.1-36.5%) in group B (P = .006). Median survival in resected patients was 23 months for group A and 22 months for group B. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant treatment seems to have some activity in patients with borderline/unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Nearly one third of tumors initially deemed marginal for operative intervention were able to be ultimately resected after treatment. Until more effective targeted chemotherapeutics are developed, the only group of patients with pancreatic cancer that may benefit from neoadjuvant treatment are those with locally advanced disease.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: T.B. Brunner; G.G. Grabenbauer; S. Kastl; O. Herrmann; U. Baum; R. Fietkau; P. Klein; W. Bautz; T. Schneider; W. Hohenberger; R. Sauer Journal: Onkologie Date: 2000-10
Authors: Helmut Oettle; Stefan Post; Peter Neuhaus; Klaus Gellert; Jan Langrehr; Karsten Ridwelski; Harald Schramm; Joerg Fahlke; Carl Zuelke; Christof Burkart; Klaus Gutberlet; Erika Kettner; Harald Schmalenberg; Karin Weigang-Koehler; Wolf-Otto Bechstein; Marco Niedergethmann; Ingo Schmidt-Wolf; Lars Roll; Bernd Doerken; Hanno Riess Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Margaret Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Edgar Ben-Josef; Pankaj Bhargava; Ephraim S Casper; Paula Kim; Mokenge P Malafa; Eric K Nakakura; Stephen Shibata; Mark Talamonti; Hanlin Wang; Christopher Willett Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Jerome Landry; Paul J Catalano; Charles Staley; Wayne Harris; John Hoffman; Mark Talamonti; Natalie Xu; Harry Cooper; Al B Benson Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Irene Epelboym; J DiNorcia; M Winner; M K Lee; J A Lee; B A Schrope; J A Chabot; J D Allendorf Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Thomas Seufferlein; Marc Porzner; Volker Heinemann; Andrea Tannapfel; Martin Stuschke; Waldemar Uhl Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Samhita Chakraborty; Monica M Morris; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Edward B Stelow; Gina Petroni; Hanna K Sanoff Journal: Gastrointest Cancer Res Date: 2014-01
Authors: Raphael L C Araujo; Sébastien Gaujoux; Florence Huguet; Mithat Gonen; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; William R Jarnagin; Karyn A Goodman; Peter J Allen Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-10 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Eric A Mellon; Tobin J Strom; Sarah E Hoffe; Jessica M Frakes; Gregory M Springett; Pamela J Hodul; Mokenge P Malafa; Michael D Chuong; Ravi Shridhar Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2016-08