Literature DB >> 15922084

Making the most of affinity tags.

David S Waugh1.   

Abstract

Proteins do not naturally lend themselves to high-throughput analysis because of their diverse physiochemical properties. Consequently, affinity tags have become indispensable tools for structural and functional proteomics initiatives. Although originally developed to facilitate the detection and purification of recombinant proteins, in recent years it has become clear that affinity tags can have a positive impact on the yield, solubility and even the folding of their fusion partners. However, no single affinity tag is optimal with respect to all of these parameters; each has its strengths and weaknesses. Therefore, combinatorial tagging might be the only way to harness the full potential of affinity tags in a high-throughput setting.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15922084     DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Biotechnol        ISSN: 0167-7799            Impact factor:   19.536


  132 in total

1.  How far can we go with structural mass spectrometry of protein complexes?

Authors:  Michal Sharon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  The substrate specificity of Metarhizium anisopliae and Bos taurus carboxypeptidases A: insights into their use as tools for the removal of affinity tags.

Authors:  Brian P Austin; József Tözsér; Péter Bagossi; Joseph E Tropea; David S Waugh
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  Inntags: small self-structured epitopes for innocuous protein tagging.

Authors:  Maya V Georgieva; Galal Yahya; Laia Codó; Raúl Ortiz; Laura Teixidó; José Claros; Ricardo Jara; Mònica Jara; Antoni Iborra; Josep Lluís Gelpí; Carme Gallego; Modesto Orozco; Martí Aldea
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  One-step purification of a recombinant protein from a whole cell extract by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Janine B Mills; Colin T Mant; Robert S Hodges
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.759

5.  Effect of N-terminal solubility enhancing fusion proteins on yield of purified target protein.

Authors:  Martin Hammarström; Esmeralda A Woestenenk; Niklas Hellgren; Torleif Härd; Helena Berglund
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2006-07-19

6.  Gateway vectors for the production of combinatorially-tagged His6-MBP fusion proteins in the cytoplasm and periplasm of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sreedevi Nallamsetty; Brian P Austin; Kerri J Penrose; David S Waugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Ligation independent cloning vectors for expression of SUMO fusions.

Authors:  Stephen D Weeks; Mark Drinker; Patrick J Loll
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 8.  The neurobiologist's guide to structural biology: a primer on why macromolecular structure matters and how to evaluate structural data.

Authors:  Daniel L Minor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Mutations that alter the equilibrium between open and closed conformations of Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein impede its ability to enhance the solubility of passenger proteins.

Authors:  Sreedevi Nallamsetty; David S Waugh
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Fusion partners can increase the expression of recombinant interleukins via transient transfection in 2936E cells.

Authors:  Jane Carter; Jue Zhang; Thien-Lan Dang; Haruki Hasegawa; Janet D Cheng; Irene Gianan; Jason W O'Neill; Martin Wolfson; Sophia Siu; Sheldon Qu; David Meininger; Helen Kim; John Delaney; Christopher Mehlin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.