BACKGROUND: Human Urotensin II (hU-II) is the most potent vasoconstrictor known to date. HU-II receptors are predominant in the human heart and arterial vessels, suggesting hU-II to be of importance as a cardiovascular mediator. METHODS: We studied 32 consecutive patients (60+/-12 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 10 control subjects (54+/-12 years, n.s.) with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Blood samples for the measurement of plasma hU-II and big-endothelin-1 (big-ET1) were obtained at rest and at peak exercise. RESULTS: Peak VO(2) was significantly higher in controls than in CHF patients (19.8+/-3.8 vs. 14.7+/-3.6 ml min(-1) kg(-1), P<0.001). Big-ET1 levels were increased in CHF compared to controls at rest (2.8+/-1.8 vs. 1.7+/-0.1 fmol/ml, P<0.01) and at peak exercise (2.7+/-1.7 vs. 1.6+/-0.2 fmol/ml, P<0.005). HU-II concentrations were comparable in patients with CHF and controls at rest (2990+/-1104 vs. 3290+/-508 pg/ml, n.s.) and peak exercise (3063+/-1185 vs. 3213+/-1188 pg/ml, n.s.). Resting hU-II levels demonstrated no correlation with peak VO(2) in controls or CHF patients. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of circulating plasma levels of hU-II does not seem to be very helpful in studying the effects of hU-II in human cardiovascular regulation. A local paracrine or autocrine mediator effect of hU-II in CHF is possible.
BACKGROUND:HumanUrotensin II (hU-II) is the most potent vasoconstrictor known to date. HU-II receptors are predominant in the human heart and arterial vessels, suggesting hU-II to be of importance as a cardiovascular mediator. METHODS: We studied 32 consecutive patients (60+/-12 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF) and 10 control subjects (54+/-12 years, n.s.) with cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Blood samples for the measurement of plasma hU-II and big-endothelin-1 (big-ET1) were obtained at rest and at peak exercise. RESULTS: Peak VO(2) was significantly higher in controls than in CHFpatients (19.8+/-3.8 vs. 14.7+/-3.6 ml min(-1) kg(-1), P<0.001). Big-ET1 levels were increased in CHF compared to controls at rest (2.8+/-1.8 vs. 1.7+/-0.1 fmol/ml, P<0.01) and at peak exercise (2.7+/-1.7 vs. 1.6+/-0.2 fmol/ml, P<0.005). HU-II concentrations were comparable in patients with CHF and controls at rest (2990+/-1104 vs. 3290+/-508 pg/ml, n.s.) and peak exercise (3063+/-1185 vs. 3213+/-1188 pg/ml, n.s.). Resting hU-II levels demonstrated no correlation with peak VO(2) in controls or CHFpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of circulating plasma levels of hU-II does not seem to be very helpful in studying the effects of hU-II in human cardiovascular regulation. A local paracrine or autocrine mediator effect of hU-II in CHF is possible.
Authors: D J Behm; J J McAtee; J W Dodson; M J Neeb; H E Fries; C A Evans; R R Hernandez; K D Hoffman; S M Harrison; J M Lai; C Wu; N V Aiyar; E H Ohlstein; S A Douglas Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-06-30 Impact factor: 8.739