Literature DB >> 15919589

The relationship between life span and adult body size is highly strain-specific in Drosophila melanogaster.

Aziz A Khazaeli1, Wayne Van Voorhies, James W Curtsinger.   

Abstract

Among mammals, body size and life span tend to vary inversely within species, but the pattern is less clear in invertebrates. Here, we report on survival and weight of male flies from 29 laboratory strains of Drosophila melanogaster. Natural variation in body mass was enhanced by rearing larvae under normal and limited food conditions. Strain, weight, and larval treatment have significant effects on survival, but higher order interactions are also significant, indicating strain specificity. For pooled data the overall relationship between mass and life span is slight, positive, and statistically significant, but mass explains < or =1% of the variation in survival. This result is opposite to the common prediction of an inverse relationship between longevity and body size. Effects of artificially reduced body size vary substantially in both sign and magnitude from strain to strain, though long-lived strains generally retain their enhanced survival characteristics. Within-line regressions of life span on mass also vary dramatically from strain to strain; in Canton-S, the most extreme case, mass explains >40% of the variation in survival. For long-lived 'O' lines reared under normal larval conditions, smaller flies live 16% longer than larger flies; the latter are significantly underrepresented in the most advanced age class. We conclude that the body size-life span relationship is highly strain-specific; that inconsistencies in the literature probably reflect real biological variation; and that variation in body size can be a significant source of experimental noise in survival studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15919589     DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Gerontol        ISSN: 0531-5565            Impact factor:   4.032


  8 in total

1.  New experiments for an undivided genetics.

Authors:  Michael R Rose; Laurence D Mueller; Molly K Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Loss of Drosophila pheromone reverses its role in sexual communication in Drosophila suzukii.

Authors:  Teun Dekker; Santosh Revadi; Suzan Mansourian; Sukanya Ramasamy; Sebastien Lebreton; Paul G Becher; Sergio Angeli; Omar Rota-Stabelli; Gianfranco Anfora
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  p53, sex, and aging: lessons from the fruit fly.

Authors:  Jae H Hur; David W Walker
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.682

4.  Adaptation, aging, and genomic information.

Authors:  Michael R Rose
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 5.682

5.  Size relationships of different body parts in the three dipteran species Drosophila melanogaster, Ceratitis capitata and Musca domestica.

Authors:  Natalia Siomava; Ernst A Wimmer; Nico Posnien
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Hsp90 is important for fecundity, longevity, and buffering of cryptic deleterious variation in wild fly populations.

Authors:  Bing Chen; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Adaptation to developmental diet influences the response to selection on age at reproduction in the fruit fly.

Authors:  Christina M May; Joost van den Heuvel; Agnieszka Doroszuk; Katja M Hoedjes; Thomas Flatt; Bas J Zwaan
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Control of lifespan and survival by Drosophila NF-κB signaling through neuroendocrine cells and neuroblasts.

Authors:  Sinan Khor; Dongsheng Cai
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 5.682

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.