Literature DB >> 15917685

Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique.

Nigel J Souter1, Harold H Messer.   

Abstract

A technique utilizing modified Gates Glidden burs and ultrasonics has recently been advocated to remove fractured instruments from root canals. Varying extents of tooth structure are removed during this procedure, potentially leading to complications. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo complications associated with fractured file removal. Fractured instrument fragments were removed from three different levels (coronal, middle, or apical third) of mesiolingual canals of extracted human mandibular molars. The success rate, frequency of perforations, and root strength were recorded for each group. Perforations and unsuccessful file removal occurred only with fragments lodged in the apical third. Fracture resistance declined significantly with more apically located file fragments. A review of 60 clinical cases showed similar rates of successful file removal and rate of perforations. Removal of a fractured file fragment from the apical third of curved canals should not be routinely attempted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15917685     DOI: 10.1097/01.don.0000148148.98255.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  14 in total

1.  Sealer penetration: effect of separated file's cross-section, taper and motion characteristics.

Authors:  Ayhan Eymirli; Emel Uzunoğlu Özyürek; Ahmet Serper
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Nonsurgical Management of a Large Periapical Lesion Following Instrument Retrieval From the Apical Third: A Case Report With a Three-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sudha Yadav; Ruchika R Nawal; Sangeeta Talwar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-14

3.  Retrieval of a separated nickel-titanium instrument using a modified 18-guage needle and cyanoacrylate glue: a case report.

Authors:  Syed Mukhtar-Un-Nisar Andrabi; Ashok Kumar; Huma Iftekhar; Sharique Alam
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-05-28

4.  Comparative evaluation of sealing properties of different obturation systems placed over apically fractured rotary NiTi files.

Authors:  Sonali Taneja; Rupali Chadha; Ruchi Gupta; Anupama Gupta
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-01

5.  Self-adjusting file (SAF) separation in clinical use: A preliminary survey among experienced SAF users regarding prevalence and retrieval methods.

Authors:  Michael Solomonov; Joe Ben-Itzhak; Anda Kfir; Oscar von Stetten; Elena Lipatova; Eleftherios T Farmakis
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2015 May-Jun

6.  Ultrasonic Technique to Retrieve a Rotary Nickel-Titanium File Broken Beyond the Apex and a Stainless Steel File from the Root Canal of a Mandibular Molar: A Case Report.

Authors:  Vineet Agrawal; Sonali Kapoor; Mukesh Patel
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-07

7.  Removal of a Broken Instrument from a Tooth with Apical Periodontitis Using a Novel Approach.

Authors:  Azar Heydari; Mona Rahmani; Mostafa Heydari
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2016-05-01

8.  Alternating versus continuous rotation: Root canal transportation and centering ratio with the ProTaper Next.

Authors:  Juan González-Chapela; Pablo Castelo-Baz; Purificación Varela-Patiño; Benjamín Martín-Biedma; Manuel Ruíz-Piñón
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

9.  Management of Intracanal Separated File Fragment in a Four-Rooted Mandibular Third Molar.

Authors:  Benoy Jacob; Anjaneyulu K; Aishwarya Ranganath; Riluwan Siddique
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems.

Authors:  Nimet Gencoglu; Dilek Helvacioglu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2009-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.