Erik Ingelsson1, Johan Arnlöv, Johan Sundström, Lars Lind. 1. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Section of Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Box 609, SE-75125 Uppsala, Sweden. erik.ingelsson@pubcare.uu.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The accuracy of a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) in hospital discharge registers is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the validity of such a diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a population-based study of 2322 middle-aged men (the ULSAM study), 321 participants were diagnosed with HF according to the Swedish hospital discharge register, during a median follow-up time of 29 years. A review board examined the validity of the diagnosis according to the European Society of Cardiology definition of HF. Eighty-two percent of the possible cases were classified as having definite HF. An echocardiographic examination increased the validity to 88%. For patients treated at an internal medicine or cardiology clinic the validity was 86% and 91%, respectively. If HF was the primary diagnosis, the validity was 95%, irrespective of clinic type. CONCLUSION: The HF diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register appears slightly less precise than for acute myocardial infarction and stroke. For population-based research, only those with a primary diagnosis of HF in the hospital discharge register should be regarded as definite HF cases, or alternatively the cases should be validated individually.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The accuracy of a diagnosis of heart failure (HF) in hospital discharge registers is largely unknown. We aimed to determine the validity of such a diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a population-based study of 2322 middle-aged men (the ULSAM study), 321 participants were diagnosed with HF according to the Swedish hospital discharge register, during a median follow-up time of 29 years. A review board examined the validity of the diagnosis according to the European Society of Cardiology definition of HF. Eighty-two percent of the possible cases were classified as having definite HF. An echocardiographic examination increased the validity to 88%. For patients treated at an internal medicine or cardiology clinic the validity was 86% and 91%, respectively. If HF was the primary diagnosis, the validity was 95%, irrespective of clinic type. CONCLUSION: The HF diagnosis in the Swedish hospital discharge register appears slightly less precise than for acute myocardial infarction and stroke. For population-based research, only those with a primary diagnosis of HF in the hospital discharge register should be regarded as definite HF cases, or alternatively the cases should be validated individually.
Authors: J Gustav Smith; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Almgren; Joachim Struck; Nils G Morgenthaler; Andreas Bergmann; Pyotr G Platonov; Bo Hedblad; Gunnar Engström; Thomas J Wang; Olle Melander Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Olle Melander; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Almgren; Bo Hedblad; Göran Berglund; Gunnar Engström; Margaretha Persson; J Gustav Smith; Martin Magnusson; Anders Christensson; Joachim Struck; Nils G Morgenthaler; Andreas Bergmann; Michael J Pencina; Thomas J Wang Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Jan Adolfsson; Hans Garmo; Anna Bill-Axelson; Ola Bratt; Erik Ingelsson; Mats Lambe; Pär Stattin; Lars Holmberg Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 41.316