Literature DB >> 1591625

Limitations of the scrape-loading/dye transfer technique to quantify inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication.

S C McKarns1, D J Doolittle.   

Abstract

Gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) is recognized as playing an important role in normal cell proliferation and development. Chemically induced alteration of GJIC has been proposed to be associated with abnormal cellular growth and/or tumor promotion. Several in vitro assays are currently used to determine the effects of chemicals on GJIC between cultured mammalian cells. One of these assays, the scrape-loading dye transfer (SL/DT) technique, is based on monitoring the transfer of the fluorescent dye Lucifer yellow from one cell into adjacent cells via functional gap junctions. The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare various approaches for quantifying results obtained with the SL/DT technique. Confluent cultures of either WB rat liver epithelial cells or LC-540 rat leydig cells were exposed to the animal tumor promoter 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), solvent (0.1% ethanol), or culture medium for one hour at 37 degrees C prior to analysis of GJIC. Inhibition of dye transfer was clearly evident following TPA exposure. Quantification of this dye transfer was assessed via four approaches: manually counting the number of labeled cells; measuring the distance of dye travel from the scrape line; quantifying the amount of cellular dye uptake; and determining the distribution of dye away from the scrape line. Our results suggest that while the SL/DT technique can be effectively used as a tool to determine the qualitative presence or absence of GJIC, its use in quantifying changes in GJIC following chemical exposure is limited. Since concentration-dependent responses are critical in chemical testing, application of the SL/DT method should be restricted to a screening assay for qualitatively assessing the presence or absence of GJIC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591625     DOI: 10.1007/bf00119297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  35 in total

1.  Characterization of a rat liver epithelial cell line to detect inhibitors of metabolic cooperation.

Authors:  C Jone; J E Trosko; C C Chang
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1987-03

Review 2.  Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  A diploid epithelial cell line from normal adult rat liver with phenotypic properties of 'oval' cells.

Authors:  M S Tsao; J D Smith; K G Nelson; J W Grisham
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Functional connections between cells as revealed by dye-coupling with a highly fluorescent naphthalimide tracer.

Authors:  W W Stewart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Elimination of metabolic cooperation in Chinese hamster cells by a tumor promoter.

Authors:  L P Yotti; C C Chang; J E Trosko
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effects of tumor promoters, genotoxic carcinogens and hepatocytotoxins on mouse hepatocyte intercellular communication.

Authors:  R J Ruch; J E Klaunig
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.691

7.  Inhibition of metabolic cooperation between mammalian cells in culture by tumor promoters.

Authors:  R F Newbold; J Amos
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  The modulation of gap junctional communication by gossypol in various mammalian cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  Y X Ye; D Bombick; K Hirst; G X Zhang; C C Chang; J E Trosko; T Akera
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1990-05

9.  Inhibition of intercellular communication by tumor-promoting phorbol esters.

Authors:  D J Fitzgerald; A W Murray
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Cell junction and cycle AMP: III. Promotion of junctional membrane permeability and junctional membrane particles in a junction-deficient cell type.

Authors:  R Azarnia; G Dahl; W R Loewenstein
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.843

View more
  5 in total

1.  Applications of electroporation of adherent cells in situ, on a partly conductive slide.

Authors:  L H Raptis; H L Brownell; S K Liu; K L Firth; L W MacKenzie; C D Stiles; J A Alberta
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulates connexin-43 expression and intercellular communication of cardiac fibroblasts.

Authors:  B W Doble; E Kardami
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1995-02-09       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  A modified parachute assay for assessment of gap junction intercellular communication in placental trophoblast cells.

Authors:  Jeremy Gingrich; Yong Pu; Almudena Veiga-Lopez
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.019

4.  Triazine derivatives inhibit rat hepatocarcinogenesis but do not enhance gap junctional intercellular communication.

Authors:  T Hori; M Asamoto; V Krutovskikh; Y Iwahori; M Maeda; H Toriyama-Baba; N Takasuka; H Tsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1997-01

5.  Specificity of gap junction communication among human mammary cells and connexin transfectants in culture.

Authors:  C Tomasetto; M J Neveu; J Daley; P K Horan; R Sager
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 10.539

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.