Literature DB >> 15915863

Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics.

Taylor Martin1, Karen Rayne, Nate J Kemp, Jack Hart, Kenneth R Diller.   

Abstract

This paper considers an approach to teaching ethics in bioengineering based on the How People Learn (HPL) framework. Curricula based on this framework have been effective in mathematics and science instruction from the kindergarten to the college levels. This framework is well suited to teaching bioengineering ethics because it helps learners develop "adaptive expertise". Adaptive expertise refers to the ability to use knowledge and experience in a domain to learn in unanticipated situations. It differs from routine expertise, which requires using knowledge appropriately to solve routine problems. Adaptive expertise is an important educational objective for bioengineers because the regulations and knowledge base in the discipline are likely to change significantly over the course of their careers. This study compares the performance of undergraduate bioengineering students who learned about ethics for stem cell research using the HPL method of instruction to the performance of students who learned following a standard lecture sequence. Both groups learned the factual material equally well, but the HPL group was more prepared to act adaptively when presented with a novel situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15915863     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-005-0045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  1 in total

1.  Duties to stakeholders amidst pressures from shareholders: lessons from an advisory panel on transplant policy.

Authors:  Ann M Mongoven
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.898

  1 in total
  12 in total

1.  Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Bradley J Brummel; C K Gunsalus; Kerri L Anderson; Michael C Loui
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The use of moral dilemmas for teaching agricultural engineers.

Authors:  J Félix Lozano; Guillermo Palau-Salvador; Vincent Gozálvez; Alejandra Boni
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  PRiME: integrating professional responsibility into the engineering curriculum.

Authors:  Christy Moore; Hillary Hart; D'Arcy Randall; Steven P Nichols
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.

Authors:  Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2016-05-27

5.  Making Choices: Ethical Decisions in a Global Context.

Authors:  Sheila Bonde; Clyde Briant; Paul Firenze; Julianne Hanavan; Amy Huang; Min Li; N C Narayanan; D Parthasarathy; Hongqin Zhao
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing case analyses in bioengineering ethics education.

Authors:  Ilya M Goldin; Rosa Lynn Pinkus; Kevin Ashley
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The role of professional knowledge in case-based reasoning in practical ethics.

Authors:  Rosa Lynn Pinkus; Claire Gloeckner; Angela Fortunato
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 8.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.