Literature DB >> 15913966

Effects of operating conditions on the adhesive strength of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms in tubes.

M J Chen1, Z Zhang, T R Bott.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanical properties of biofilms, especially the force required to disrupt them and remove them from substrata is very important to development of antibiofouling strategies. In this work, a novel micromanipulation technique with a specially designed T-shaped probe has been developed to serve as an experimental means to measure directly the adhesive strength of biofouling deposits on the surface of a glass test stud. The basic principle of this novel technique is to pull away a whole biofilm accumulated on the surface of a glass test stud with T-shaped probe, and to measure simultaneously the force imposed on the biofilm. The adhesive strength between the biofilms and the surface to which they are attached, is defined as the work per unit area required to remove the biofilms from the surface. The biofouling experiments were performed on an elaborate design of a simulated heat exchanger system. A monoculture of Pseudomonas fluorescens was chosen as the fouling microorganism for the laboratory studies. Results indicate that the adhesive strength of the biofilm was affected by the conditions of operation, such as biofilm age, nutrient concentration, suspended cell concentration, pH, surface roughness of the substratum and fluid velocity. As noted, the effect of fluid velocity on the biofilm adhesive strength seemed to overwhelm other factors. At the same operating conditions, the biofilm adhesive strength increased as the fluid velocity increased within the range of 0.6-1.6m/s. In addition, the flow-related biofilm structures were observed that biofilms generally grew as a more compact pattern at the higher fluid velocity. Apparently, the fluid velocity can affect the biofilm structure, which in turn determines the biofilm adhesive strength. The knowledge of the biofilm adhesive strength with associated influences of the operating conditions may be used to define better cleaning procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15913966     DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces        ISSN: 0927-7765            Impact factor:   5.268


  14 in total

1.  Biofilm cohesiveness measurement using a novel atomic force microscopy methodology.

Authors:  Francois Ahimou; Michael J Semmens; Paige J Novak; Greg Haugstad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of CaCO₃ particles and suspended bacteria on biofilm components and activity in the model recirculating cooling water system.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Wenwen Dong; Fei Yang; Lei Lu; Yongqiang Wang; Xiaochen Yin; Chaocheng Zhao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Single particle tracking reveals spatial and dynamic organization of the E. coli biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Alona Birjiniuk; Nicole Billings; Elizabeth Nance; Justin Hanes; Katharina Ribbeck; Patrick S Doyle
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.729

Review 4.  Material properties of biofilms-a review of methods for understanding permeability and mechanics.

Authors:  Nicole Billings; Alona Birjiniuk; Tahoura S Samad; Patrick S Doyle; Katharina Ribbeck
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2015-02-26

5.  Comparison of planktonic and biofilm cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 8341 cells grown on fluoroacetate.

Authors:  Barry Heffernan; Cormac D Murphy; Eoin Casey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Nanostructured Coating for Biomaterial Lubrication through Biomacromolecular Recruitment.

Authors:  Hongping Wan; Xinghong Zhao; Chengxiong Lin; Hans Jan Kaper; Prashant Kumar Sharma
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 9.229

7.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of Biofilm Formation by Rhodopseudomonas palustris Growth under Two Metabolic Modes.

Authors:  Chase Kernan; Philicia P Chow; Rebecca J Christianson; Jean Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of the design of fresh-cut food washing tanks on the growth kinetics of Pseudomonas fluorescens biofilms.

Authors:  Laurent Bouvier; Charles Cunault; Christine Faille; Heni Dallagi; Laurent Wauquier; Thierry Bénézech
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-05-02

Review 9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa dose response and bathing water infection.

Authors:  D J Roser; B van den Akker; S Boase; C N Haas; N J Ashbolt; S A Rice
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Biofilm Cohesive Strength as a Basis for Biofilm Recalcitrance: Are Bacterial Biofilms Overdesigned?

Authors:  Srijan Aggarwal; Philip S Stewart; Raymond M Hozalski
Journal:  Microbiol Insights       Date:  2016-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.