Eliana Miller Perrin1, Kori B Flower, Joanne Garrett, Alice S Ammerman. 1. Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7220, USA. eliana_perrin@med.unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: With respect to obesity prevention and treatment, to determine pediatricians' 1) treatment self-efficacy; 2) perceived barriers and relationships to management self-efficacy; 3) desired resources; and 4) willingness to be involved in advocacy. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey queried members of the North Carolina Pediatrics Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics who were practicing routine care. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 71% (n = 356). Only 12% of respondents reported high self-efficacy in obesity management, yet 39% believed that physicians could potentially be effective. The most frequently encountered barriers to obesity management included availability of fast food (97%) and soft drinks (95%). However, some practice-based barriers were most strongly associated with self-efficacy. Odds of high self-efficacy were lower for respondents who reported lack of non-MD staff reimbursement (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.92), lack of on-site dietitian (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.50, 0.83), or lack of patient educational materials (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50, 0.89), compared with those who reported encountering these barriers infrequently. Respondents chose better counseling tools (96%) as the most helpful clinical resource for obesity management. Most (89%) were willing to take at least a small role in advocacy efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatricians reported feeling ineffective in their ability to treat obesity. Some practice-based barriers were specifically associated with low self-efficacy. However, pediatricians welcomed multiple clinical resources for obesity management and expressed willingness to advocate for policy change. Practice-based tool kits and efforts to engage willing participants in advocacy may help pediatricians combat this epidemic.
OBJECTIVE: With respect to obesity prevention and treatment, to determine pediatricians' 1) treatment self-efficacy; 2) perceived barriers and relationships to management self-efficacy; 3) desired resources; and 4) willingness to be involved in advocacy. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey queried members of the North Carolina Pediatrics Society and the American Academy of Pediatrics who were practicing routine care. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 71% (n = 356). Only 12% of respondents reported high self-efficacy in obesity management, yet 39% believed that physicians could potentially be effective. The most frequently encountered barriers to obesity management included availability of fast food (97%) and soft drinks (95%). However, some practice-based barriers were most strongly associated with self-efficacy. Odds of high self-efficacy were lower for respondents who reported lack of non-MD staff reimbursement (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58, 0.92), lack of on-site dietitian (OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.50, 0.83), or lack of patient educational materials (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50, 0.89), compared with those who reported encountering these barriers infrequently. Respondents chose better counseling tools (96%) as the most helpful clinical resource for obesity management. Most (89%) were willing to take at least a small role in advocacy efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatricians reported feeling ineffective in their ability to treat obesity. Some practice-based barriers were specifically associated with low self-efficacy. However, pediatricians welcomed multiple clinical resources for obesity management and expressed willingness to advocate for policy change. Practice-based tool kits and efforts to engage willing participants in advocacy may help pediatricians combat this epidemic.
Authors: Thomas N Robinson; Donna Matheson; Manisha Desai; Darrell M Wilson; Dana L Weintraub; William L Haskell; Arianna McClain; Samuel McClure; Jorge A Banda; Lee M Sanders; K Farish Haydel; Joel D Killen Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sarah L Goff; Joanne M Foody; Silvio Inzucchi; David Katz; Susan T Mayne; Harlan M Krumholz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sian Hsiang-Te Tsuei; Veronic Clair; Victoria Mutiso; Abednego Musau; Albert Tele; Erica Frank; David Ndetei Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 3.836
Authors: Samareh G Hill; Thao-Ly T Phan; George A Datto; Jobayer Hossain; Lloyd N Werk; Diane Abatemarco Journal: J Child Health Care Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 1.979
Authors: Jonathan D Klein; Tracy S Sesselberg; Mark S Johnson; Karen G O'Connor; Stephen Cook; Marian Coon; Charles Homer; Nancy Krebs; Reginald Washington Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: R S Doshi; K A Gudzune; L N Dyrbye; J F Dovidio; S E Burke; R O White; S Perry; M Yeazel; M van Ryn; S M Phelan Journal: Clin Obes Date: 2018-10-24