OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine pediatrician implementation of BMI and provider interventions for childhood overweight prevention and treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Periodic Survey of Fellows No. 65, a nationally representative survey of AAP members. Surveys that addressed the provision of screening and management of childhood overweight and obesity in primary care settings were mailed to 1622 nonretired US AAP members in 2006. RESULTS: One thousand five (62%) surveys were returned; 677 primary care clinicians in active practice were eligible for the survey. Nearly all respondents (99%) reported measuring height and weight at well visits, and 97% visually assess children for overweight at most or every well-child visit. Half of the respondents (52%) assess BMI percentile for children older than 2 years. Most pediatricians reported that they do not have time to counsel on overweight and obesity, that counseling has poor results, and that having simple diet and exercise recommendations would be helpful in their practice. Pediatricians in large practices and those who had attended continuing medical education on obesity were more familiar with national expert guidelines, were more likely to use BMI percentile, and had higher self-efficacy in practices related to childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity. Multivariate analysis revealed that pediatricians with better access to community and adjunct resources were more likely to use BMI percentile. CONCLUSIONS: BMI-percentile screening in primary pediatric practice is underused. Most pediatricians believe that they can and should try to prevent overweight and obesity, yet few believe there are good treatments once a child is obese. Training, time, and resource limitations affect BMI-percentile use. Awareness of national guidelines may improve rates of BMI-percentile use and recognition of opportunities to prevent childhood and adolescent obesity.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine pediatrician implementation of BMI and provider interventions for childhood overweight prevention and treatment. METHODS: Data were obtained from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Periodic Survey of Fellows No. 65, a nationally representative survey of AAP members. Surveys that addressed the provision of screening and management of childhood overweight and obesity in primary care settings were mailed to 1622 nonretired US AAP members in 2006. RESULTS: One thousand five (62%) surveys were returned; 677 primary care clinicians in active practice were eligible for the survey. Nearly all respondents (99%) reported measuring height and weight at well visits, and 97% visually assess children for overweight at most or every well-child visit. Half of the respondents (52%) assess BMI percentile for children older than 2 years. Most pediatricians reported that they do not have time to counsel on overweight and obesity, that counseling has poor results, and that having simple diet and exercise recommendations would be helpful in their practice. Pediatricians in large practices and those who had attended continuing medical education on obesity were more familiar with national expert guidelines, were more likely to use BMI percentile, and had higher self-efficacy in practices related to childhood and adolescent overweight and obesity. Multivariate analysis revealed that pediatricians with better access to community and adjunct resources were more likely to use BMI percentile. CONCLUSIONS: BMI-percentile screening in primary pediatric practice is underused. Most pediatricians believe that they can and should try to prevent overweight and obesity, yet few believe there are good treatments once a child is obese. Training, time, and resource limitations affect BMI-percentile use. Awareness of national guidelines may improve rates of BMI-percentile use and recognition of opportunities to prevent childhood and adolescent obesity.
Authors: Allison A Hedley; Cynthia L Ogden; Clifford L Johnson; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Katherine M Flegal Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-06-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mary T Story; Dianne R Neumark-Stzainer; Nancy E Sherwood; Katrina Holt; Denise Sofka; Frederick L Trowbridge; Sarah E Barlow Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Glenn Flores; Elena Fuentes-Afflick; Oxiris Barbot; Olivia Carter-Pokras; Luz Claudio; Marielena Lara; Jennie A McLaurin; Lee Pachter; Francisco J Ramos-Gomez; Fernando Mendoza; R Burciaga Valdez; Antonia M Villarruel; Ruth E Zambrana; Robert Greenberg; Michael Weitzman; Francisco J Ramos Gomez Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lauren M Rossen; Yelena N Tarasenko; Amy M Branum; Alan E Simon; Kenneth C Schoendorf Journal: Child Obes Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Denise E Wilfley; Amanda E Staiano; Myra Altman; Jeanne Lindros; Angela Lima; Sandra G Hassink; William H Dietz; Stephen Cook Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-12-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nancy E Sherwood; Meghan M JaKa; A Lauren Crain; Brian C Martinson; Marcia G Hayes; Julie D Anderson Journal: Child Obes Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.992
Authors: Christy B Turer; Sarah E Barlow; David B Sarwer; Brian Adamson; Joanne Sanders; Chul Ahn; Song Zhang; Glenn Flores; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Rachael W Taylor; Deirdre Brown; Anna M Dawson; Jill Haszard; Adell Cox; Elaine A Rose; Barry J Taylor; Kim Meredith-Jones; Lee Treacy; Jim Ross; Sheila M William Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-05-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Shannon M Robson; Christopher Bolling; Mary Beth McCullough; Cathleen Odar Stough; Lori J Stark Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.406