Literature DB >> 15912414

Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Ganesh Acharya1, Ingvild Kjeldberg, Sidsel Mordt Hansen, Nils Sørheim, Bjarne Koster Jacobsen, Jan Martin Maltau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the outcome of pregnancy following loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether LEEP affects the outcome of pregnancy after 20 weeks' gestation.
METHODS: This is a matched cohort study of all women who had a LEEP for a biopsy-confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in between December 1995 and December 2000 and subsequently delivered (after 20 weeks' gestation) at the University Hospital of Northern Norway. Women who had an ectopic pregnancy or an abortion (spontaneous or induced) following LEEP were excluded from analysis. Two controls matched for the date of delivery, age, parity, previous obstetric history and smoking habit were identified for each case using routinely entered data from the birth register. The main outcome measures were the duration of pregnancy and birth weight. Other variables recorded included the grade of cervical dysplasia, size of the electrosurgical loop, age, parity, pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcome.
RESULTS: Of a total of 428 women of reproductive age who had LEEP performed during the study period, 89 had a pregnancy after the procedure. Ten women were excluded (three ectopic pregnancies, two induced abortions and five spontaneous abortions) from the study. Data from 79 women whose pregnancies progressed beyond 20 weeks and 158 matched controls were analysed. The mean age at the time of LEEP was 27 (range 19-36) years. The histological diagnosis was normal in 3 (3.8%), CIN1 in 5 (6.3%), CIN2 in 18 (22.8%), and CIN3 in 53 (67.1%) of the cases. Overall, mean gestation at delivery (38.3 vs. 39.1 weeks), mean birth weight (3,412 vs. 3,563 g), prevalence of preterm birth (11.4% vs. 10.8%) and low birth weight (10.1 vs. 5.1%) were not significantly different among the cases and controls. But when a relatively large loop (25 mm) had been used, the risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio 4.0) and low birth weight (odds ratio 14.0) was significantly higher than in controls. Pregnancy complications occurred more frequently (20 vs. 7%; p=0.006) among the cases than the controls.
CONCLUSION: LEEP in women with CIN did not significantly increase the risk of low birth weight or preterm birth in subsequent pregnancy in comparison to their controls, except when the size of electrosurgical loop was relatively large. However, the prevalence of pregnancy complications was significantly higher after LEEP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15912414     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-005-0727-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  12 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome after cervical conization: risk factors for preterm delivery and the efficacy of prophylactic cerclage.

Authors:  Ka Hyun Nam; Ja Young Kwon; Young-Han Kim; Yong-Won Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 2.  Loop electrosurgical excision procedure and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shayna N Conner; Heather A Frey; Alison G Cahill; George A Macones; Graham A Colditz; Methodius G Tuuli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias and cancers in cervical tissue by in vivo light scattering.

Authors:  Judith R Mourant; Thérese J Bocklage; Tamara M Powers; Heather M Greene; Maxine H Dorin; Alan G Waxman; Meggan M Zsemlye; Harriet O Smith
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Loop Electrosurgical Excisional Procedure (LEEP) Done for Discrepancy: Does the Time from HGSIL Affect Pathologic Grade of CIN in LEEP Specimen?

Authors:  Sue L Moreni; Caroline M Mitchell; Rochelle L Garcia; Linda O Eckert
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-06-29

5.  Risk of cesarean delivery after loop electrosurgical excision procedure.

Authors:  Heather A Frey; Molly J Stout; Anthony O Odibo; David M Stamilio; Alison G Cahill; Kimberly A Roehl; George A Macones
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Risk of preterm birth after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among women attending colposcopy in England: retrospective-prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alejandra Castanon; Peter Brocklehurst; Heather Evans; Donald Peebles; Naveena Singh; Patrick Walker; Julietta Patnick; Peter Sasieni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-08-16

7.  Pregnancy Outcomes after Treatment for Cervical Cancer Precursor Lesions: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Sheila Weinmann; Allison Naleway; Geeta Swamy; Girishanthy Krishnarajah; Bhakti Arondekar; Jovelle Fernandez; Evan Myers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Anita Mitra; Marc Arbyn; Maria Paraskevaidi; Antonios Athanasiou; Pierre P L Martin-Hirsch; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-29

9.  Risk of preterm delivery associated with prior treatment of cervical precancerous lesion according to the depth of the cone.

Authors:  Roberto Berretta; Salvatore Gizzo; Andrea Dall'Asta; Eleonora Mazzone; Michela Monica; Laura Franchi; Francesca Peri; Tito Silvio Patrelli; Alberto Bacchi Modena
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 10.  Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria Kyrgiou; Antonios Athanasiou; Maria Paraskevaidi; Anita Mitra; Ilkka Kalliala; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; Marc Arbyn; Phillip Bennett; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.