OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work analyzes the experience of nearly 2 decades by the same team in a single center. Outcomes of OLT and factors affecting survival were analyzed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 3200 consecutive OLTs that were performed at our institution, between February 1984 and December 31, 2001. RESULTS: Of 2662 recipients, 578 (21.7%) and 659 (24.7%) were pediatric and urgent patients, respectively. Overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year patient and graft survival estimates were 81%, 72%, 68%, 64% and 73%, 64%, 59%, 55%, respectively. Patient survival significantly improved in the second (1992-2001) versus the era I (1984-1991) of transplantation (P < 0.001). Similarly, graft survival was better in the era II of transplantation (P < 0.02). However, biliary and infectious complications increased in era II. When OLT indications were considered, best recipient survival was obtained in children with biliary atresia (82%, 79%, and 78% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), while malignant disease in adult patients resulted in the worst outcomes of 68% and 43% at 1 and 5 years, post-OLT. Further, patients <18 years and nonurgent recipients exhibited superior survival when compared with recipients >18 years (P < 0.001) or urgent patients (P < 0.001). Of 13 donor and recipient variables, era of OLT, recipient age, urgent status, donor age, donor length of hospital stay, etiology of liver disease, retransplantation, warm and cold ischemia, but not graft type (whole, split, living-donor), significantly impacted patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term benefits of OLT are greatest in pediatric and nonurgent patients. Multiple factors involving the recipient, etiology of liver disease, donor characteristics, operative variables, and surgical experience influence long-term survival outcomes. By balancing and matching these factors with a given recipient, optimum results can be achieved.
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). This work analyzes the experience of nearly 2 decades by the same team in a single center. Outcomes of OLT and factors affecting survival were analyzed. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 3200 consecutive OLTs that were performed at our institution, between February 1984 and December 31, 2001. RESULTS: Of 2662 recipients, 578 (21.7%) and 659 (24.7%) were pediatric and urgent patients, respectively. Overall 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year patient and graft survival estimates were 81%, 72%, 68%, 64% and 73%, 64%, 59%, 55%, respectively. Patient survival significantly improved in the second (1992-2001) versus the era I (1984-1991) of transplantation (P < 0.001). Similarly, graft survival was better in the era II of transplantation (P < 0.02). However, biliary and infectious complications increased in era II. When OLT indications were considered, best recipient survival was obtained in children with biliary atresia (82%, 79%, and 78% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), while malignant disease in adult patients resulted in the worst outcomes of 68% and 43% at 1 and 5 years, post-OLT. Further, patients <18 years and nonurgent recipients exhibited superior survival when compared with recipients >18 years (P < 0.001) or urgent patients (P < 0.001). Of 13 donor and recipient variables, era of OLT, recipient age, urgent status, donor age, donor length of hospital stay, etiology of liver disease, retransplantation, warm and cold ischemia, but not graft type (whole, split, living-donor), significantly impacted patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term benefits of OLT are greatest in pediatric and nonurgent patients. Multiple factors involving the recipient, etiology of liver disease, donor characteristics, operative variables, and surgical experience influence long-term survival outcomes. By balancing and matching these factors with a given recipient, optimum results can be achieved.
Authors: T E Starzl; S Iwatsuki; D H Van Thiel; J C Gartner; B J Zitelli; J J Malatack; R R Schade; B W Shaw; T R Hakala; J T Rosenthal; K A Porter Journal: Hepatology Date: 1982 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Dean M Anselmo; Rafik M Ghobrial; Lee Chan Jung; Michael Weaver; Carlos Cao; Sammy Saab; Greg Kunder; Pauline W Chen; Douglas G Farmer; Hasan Yersiz; Angeles Baquerizo; Sunil Geevarghese; Steven H Han; Leonard Goldstein; Curtis D Holt; Jeffrey A Gornbein; Ronald W Busuttil Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: R Y Calne; K Rolles; D J White; S Thiru; D B Evans; P McMaster; D C Dunn; G N Craddock; R G Henderson; S Aziz; P Lewis Journal: Lancet Date: 1979-11-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: H R Doyle; I R Marino; N Jabbour; G Zetti; J McMichael; S Mitchell; J Fung; T E Starzl Journal: Transplantation Date: 1994-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Carlos E Marroquin; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Paul C Kuo; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Theodore N Pappas Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: John P Duffy; Andrew Vardanian; Elizabeth Benjamin; Melissa Watson; Douglas G Farmer; Rafik M Ghobrial; Gerald Lipshutz; Hasan Yersiz; David S K Lu; Charles Lassman; Myron J Tong; Jonathan R Hiatt; Ronald W Busuttil Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 12.969