Literature DB >> 1591091

Chemotherapy versus tamoxifen versus chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in node-positive, oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer patients. An update at 7 years of the 1st GROCTA (Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemo-Hormone Therapy Cooperative Group) trial.

F Boccardo1, A Rubagotti, D Amoroso, P Sismondi, F Genta, I Nenci, A Piffanelli, A Farris, L Castagnetta, A Traina.   

Abstract

504 evaluable node positive oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients were randomly allocated to receive either 5 years tamoxifen treatment or chemotherapy [six courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) followed by 4 courses of epirubicin] or a combination of both treatments. At a median follow-up of 5 years tamoxifen appeared to be more effective than chemotherapy, the difference being highly significant in postmenopausal women. The addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen was not able to significantly improve the results achieved by tamoxifen alone, irrespective of menopausal status. Trends were similar even after stratification for the number of involved nodes. The protective effect of tamoxifen in terms of reduction of the odds of death increased with time and no rebound phenomena on recurrence or death has occurred so far after the completion of tamoxifen treatment. Overall, the prognostic value of number of involved nodes and of progesterone receptor (PgR) status was confirmed by multivariate analysis. However, the predictive value of PgR was lost in patients receiving tamoxifen alone. Similarly, the degree of ER positivity was not predictive of the response to tamoxifen. Tamoxifen treatment should still be regarded as the gold standard for postmenopausal ER positive patients. In younger women the antioestrogen proved to be safe and at least as effective as chemotherapy. However, the analysis of the annual risks suggests that the concurrent or the sequential use of chemotherapy and tamoxifen might represent a more appropriate treatment for this patient subset, particularly for those with four or more involved nodes. Different cut-offs of ER and PgR assays from those we have arbitrarily employed in the present analysis should probably be used to select more properly the patients who can benefit from endocrine therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591091     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80123-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hormonal therapy in breast cancer: a model disease for the personalization of cancer care.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Saveri Bhattacharya; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Tamoxifen versus tamoxifen plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant therapy for node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: results of a Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9401).

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Hiroji Iwata; Kenjiro Aogi; Takashi Fukutomi; Kenichi Inoue; Takayuki Kinoshita; Masato Takahashi; Akira Matsui; Taro Shibata; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Anastrozole is cost-effective vs tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer: Canadian perspectives on the ATAC completed-treatment analysis.

Authors:  A Rocchi; S Verma
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Meta-analysis of vascular and neoplastic events associated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joseph Lau; Suzanne George; Rachel Hess; Nananda F Col
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christa K Baumann; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; Adam Brufsky; Nancy Davidson
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  Survival outcome of combined GnRH agonist and tamoxifen is comparable to that of sequential adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa; Thitikon Krisorakun; Wanee Pongthong; Pornchai O-Charoenrat
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20

9.  Ovarian cysts in women receiving tamoxifen for breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Mourits; E G de Vries; P H Willemse; K A ten Hoor; H Hollema; W J Sluiter; H W de Bruijn; A G van der Zee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Tamoxifen plus tegafur-uracil (TUFT) versus tamoxifen plus Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and cyclophosphamide (ACT) as adjuvant therapy to treat node-positive premenopausal breast cancer (PreMBC): results of Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9404.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien; Hiroji Iwata; Takashi Fukutomi; Kenichi Inoue; Kenjiro Aogi; Takayuki Kinoshita; Jiro Ando; Seiki Takashima; Kenichi Nakamura; Taro Shibata; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.333

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.