Literature DB >> 31620283

Survival outcome of combined GnRH agonist and tamoxifen is comparable to that of sequential adriamycin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer.

Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa1, Thitikon Krisorakun1,2, Wanee Pongthong1, Pornchai O-Charoenrat1.   

Abstract

Survival outcome of ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen has been shown to be comparable with chemotherapy in premenopausal women; however, there are a few previous studies that compared this treatment to the current standard adriamycin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen. The aim of the present study was to compare the survival outcome of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist plus tamoxifen (GnRH-TAM) and chemotherapy AC plus tamoxifen (AC-TAM) in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer who were hormone receptor-positive. Premenopausal patients with early breast cancer who were treated at The Siriraj Hospital between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrospectively recruited. The inclusion criteria included newly diagnosed breast cancer, size ≤3 cm, node-negative and hormone receptor-positive. All patients received adjuvant systemic therapy and were divided into two groups. In the GnRH-TAM group, the patients received subcutaneous injection of 10.8 mg of goserelin every 3 months for 2-3 years and TAM (20 mg/day) for 5 years. In the AC-TAM group, AC was administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by TAM (20 mg/day) for 5 years. In total, 40 patients received GnRH-TAM and 130 patients received AC-TAM. The mean age at diagnosis was 44.4±6.3 years while the median follow up time was 77 (36-167) months. There was no mortality in either group and no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups. No adverse effect occurred and good compliance was observed in all patients who received GnRH-TAM. Treatment with GnRH-TAM resulted in a comparable survival outcome and better quality of life compared with AC-TAM.
Copyright © 2019, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early breast cancer; endocrine therapy; gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist; ovarian suppression; premenopause

Year:  2019        PMID: 31620283      PMCID: PMC6787953          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  36 in total

1.  Chemotherapy-induced Cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Maria Florescu; Mircea Cinteza; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2013-03

2.  Monthly versus 3-monthly goserelin acetate treatment in pre-menopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Hiraji Iwata; Yoshiaki Rai; Keisei Anan; Toru Takeuchi; Norio Kohno; Hiroyuki Takei; Yasuhiro Yanagita; Shinzaburo Noguchi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Complete hormonal blockade versus epirubicin-based chemotherapy in premenopausal, one to three node-positive, and hormone-receptor positive, early breast cancer patients: 7-year follow-up results of French Adjuvant Study Group 06 randomised trial.

Authors:  H Roché; P Kerbrat; J Bonneterre; P Fargeot; P Fumoleau; A Monnier; P Clavère; M-J Goudier; P Chollet; J-P Guastalla; D Serin
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  C Hürny; J Bernhard; A S Coates; M Castiglione-Gertsch; H F Peterson; R D Gelber; J F Forbes; C M Rudenstam; E Simoncini; D Crivellari; A Goldhirsch; H J Senn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-05-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression as adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor-positive pre-/perimenopausal breast cancer patients: results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 randomized trial. boccardo@hp380.ist.unige.it.

Authors:  F Boccardo; A Rubagotti; D Amoroso; M Mesiti; D Romeo; P Sismondi; M Giai; F Genta; P Pacini; V Distante; A Bolognesi; D Aldrighetti; A Farris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Leuprorelin acetate every-3-months depot versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant treatment in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: the TABLE study.

Authors:  Peter Schmid; Michael Untch; Valentin Kossé; Grigorij Bondar; Leonid Vassiljev; Valerie Tarutinov; Ute Lehmann; Lutz Maubach; Juergen Meurer; Diethelm Wallwiener; Kurt Possinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Prudence A Francis; Meredith M Regan; Gini F Fleming; István Láng; Eva Ciruelos; Meritxell Bellet; Hervé R Bonnefoi; Miguel A Climent; Gian Antonio Da Prada; Harold J Burstein; Silvana Martino; Nancy E Davidson; Charles E Geyer; Barbara A Walley; Robert Coleman; Pierre Kerbrat; Stefan Buchholz; James N Ingle; Eric P Winer; Manuela Rabaglio-Poretti; Rudolf Maibach; Barbara Ruepp; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Karen N Price; Marco Colleoni; Giuseppe Viale; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Similar efficacy for ovarian ablation compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: from a randomized comparison of premenopausal patients with node-positive, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bent Ejlertsen; Henning T Mouridsen; Maj-Britt Jensen; Nils-Olof Bengtsson; Jonas Bergh; Soren Cold; Per Edlund; Marianne Ewertz; Peter W de Graaf; Claus Kamby; Dorte L Nielsen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy followed by goserelin versus either modality alone for premenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Monica Castiglione-Gertsch; Anne O'Neill; Karen N Price; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Marco Colleoni; M Laura Nasi; Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Adjuvant ovarian ablation vs CMF chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients: trial update and impact of immunohistochemical assessment of ER status.

Authors:  C S Thomson; C J Twelves; E A Mallon; R E Leake
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.380

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Comparison Between the Online Prediction Models CancerMath and PREDICT as Prognostic Tools in Thai Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Nuanphan Polchai; Doonyapat Sa-Nguanraksa; Warapan Numprasit; Thanawat Thumrongtaradol; Eng O-Charoenrat; Pornchai O-Charoenrat
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Effectiveness of a 6-Month 22.5-mg Leuprolide Acetate Depot Formulation With Tamoxifen for Postoperative Premenopausal Estrogen Suppression in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Wu; Young-Jin Lee; Heejeong Kim; Jongwon Lee; Il Yong Chung; Jisun Kim; Saebyeol Lee; Byung-Ho Son; Sung-Bae Kim; Jae Ho Jeong; Gyungyub Gong; Sei-Hyun Ahn; BeomSeok Ko
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Major depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients with ovarian function suppression: a cross-sectional study comparing ovarian ablation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists.

Authors:  Junhan Jiang; Junnan Xu; Li Cai; Li Man; Limin Niu; Juan Hu; Tao Sun; Xinyu Zheng
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.