Literature DB >> 15910248

Reduced intensity conditioning compared to standard conditioning preserves the in vitro growth capacity of bone marrow stroma, which remains of host origin.

Alexandros Spyridonidis1, Tisa Küttler, Ralph Wäsch, Eva Samek, Miguel Waterhouse, Dirk Behringer, Hartmut Bertz, Jürgen Finke.   

Abstract

The ability of bone marrow (BM) samples to generate confluent stromal layers in long-term BM cultures (LTBMC) was used as a surrogate assay to determine the in vivo toxic effects of different conditionings on stromal cells. Here, 32 patients receiving a fludarabine-based reduced intensity conditioning regimen (FBM) were compared to those in a control group of 23 patients treated with standard busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BuCy; 14 patients) or TBI-based (TBI 12 Gy/VP16/cyclophosphamide; 9 patients) conditioning. BM was aspirated before conditioning, and at day +30 and/or at day +100, obtaining positive stromal cell growth in vitro in 58%, 47%, and 65%, respectively. FBM conditioning did not alter the ability of BM to generate stromal layers both early (day +30, 75%+) or late (day +100, 80%+) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as compared to pre-HCT (66.6%+). FBM-treated patients formed confluent stroma significantly more often than standard-treated patients (85% vs. 38% patients; p < 0.05). In an univariate analysis, standard conditioning remained the only factor predicting stromal growth impairment after allogeneic HCT. The ex vivo-generated stromal layers from 5 female, FBM treated, sex-mismatched, and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplanted patients were analyzed by combined FISH-Y and immunofluorescence stains (Vimentin, CD14, CD45) and found to be exclusively of recipient origin. We conclude that FBM reduced intensity conditioning results in reduced, if any, stromal damage as compared to standard myeloablative treatment. The novel, donor-derived, hematopoiesis in FBM patients after allogeneic transplantation is supported and maintained by a host-derived BM stromal microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910248     DOI: 10.1089/scd.2005.14.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells Dev        ISSN: 1547-3287            Impact factor:   3.272


  4 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory bone marrow microenvironment.

Authors:  Nils B Leimkühler; Rebekka K Schneider
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

2.  Melphalan exposure induces an interleukin-6 deficit in bone marrow stromal cells and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Stephanie L Rellick; Debbie Piktel; Cheryl Walton; Brett Hall; William Petros; James E Fortney; Marieta Gencheva; Jim Denvir; Gerald Hobbs; Michael Craig; Laura F Gibson
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.861

3.  Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M A Gertz; S K Kumar; M Q Lacy; A Dispenzieri; S R Hayman; F K Buadi; D Dingli; D A Gastineau; J L Winters; M R Litzow
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for improving hematopoietic function: an in vitro and in vivo model. Part 2: Effect on bone marrow microenvironment.

Authors:  Soraya Carrancio; Belen Blanco; Carlos Romo; Sandra Muntion; Natalia Lopez-Holgado; Juan F Blanco; Jesus G Briñon; Jesus F San Miguel; Fermin M Sanchez-Guijo; M Consuelo del Cañizo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.