Literature DB >> 15910009

Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy.

Jeffrey S Barrett1, Line Labbé, Marc Pfister.   

Abstract

Population pharmacokinetics has been an important technique used to explore and define relevant sources of variation in drug exposure and response in patient populations. This has been especially true in the area of antiretroviral therapy where the assurance of adequate and sustained drug exposure of multiple agents is highly correlated with therapeutic success. Population pharmacokinetic analyses across the four drug classes and 20 US FDA-approved products used to treat HIV have been published to date. The published reports were predominantly based on actual clinical trials conducted in HIV-infected patients with one or more agents administered. Modelling and simulation approaches have been used in the evaluation of antiretroviral agent outcomes incorporating problematic design and analysis factors such as sparse plasma sampling, data imbalance and censored data. Additional benefits of population modelling approaches applied to the investigation of antiretroviral agents include the ability to assess dosing compliance, understanding and quantifying drug-drug interactions in order to select dosing regimens and the screening of new drug candidates. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models have been used to characterise the relationship between drug exposure and virological and immunological response, and to predict clinical outcome. These models offer the best opportunity for individualising and optimising patient therapy, particularly when adjusted for adherence/compliance. The impact of population pharmacokinetics in the area of antiretroviral therapy can be directly assessed by its role in the validation of surrogate markers such as viral RNA load, therapeutic drug monitoring and the management of individual patient outcomes via exposure-toxicity relationships. Each of these population pharmacokinetic outcomes has contributed to the current regulatory environment, specifically in the area of accelerated approval of new antiretroviral agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15910009     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544060-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   5.577


  149 in total

Review 1.  Significance of P-glycoprotein for the pharmacology and clinical use of HIV protease inhibitors.

Authors:  M T Huisman; J W Smit; A H Schinkel
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Intra-individual variability in lopinavir plasma trough concentrations supports therapeutic drug monitoring.

Authors:  Marta Boffito; David J Back; Patrick G Hoggard; Annamaria Caci; Stefano Bonora; Riccardo Raiteri; Alessandro Sinicco; Helen E Reynolds; Saye Khoo; Giovanni Di Perri
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 3.  Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in the paediatric population: a review.

Authors:  Jennifer R King; David W Kimberlin; Grace M Aldrovandi; Edward P Acosta
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine in infants: a population analysis across studies.

Authors:  M Mirochnick; E Capparelli; J Connor
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  Using pharmacokinetics to optimize antiretroviral drug-drug interactions in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Authors:  J G Gerber
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Relationship between exposure to zidovudine and decrease of P24 antigenemia in HIV-infected patients in monotherapy.

Authors:  Patrinee Sasomsin; France Mentré; Bertrand Diquet; François Simon; Françoise Brun-Vezinet
Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.748

7.  Genotypic alteration of HAART-persistent HIV-1 reservoirs in vivo.

Authors:  Joseph Kulkosky; Julie Sullivan; Yan Xu; Anne Malin-Markham; Miguel Otero; Sandra Calarota; Jennifer Zielinski; Derek M Culnan; Roger J Pomerantz
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 3.616

8.  Lopinavir-ritonavir versus nelfinavir for the initial treatment of HIV infection.

Authors:  Sharon Walmsley; Barry Bernstein; Martin King; José Arribas; Gildon Beall; Peter Ruane; Margaret Johnson; David Johnson; Richard Lalonde; Anthony Japour; Scott Brun; Eugene Sun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction study of delavirdine and indinavir in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J J Ferry; B D Herman; B J Carel; G F Carlson; D H Batts
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol       Date:  1998-07-01

10.  Antiretroviral Therapy-associated Serious and Life-threatening Toxicities.

Authors:  Alice K. Pau
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.663

View more
  13 in total

1.  In vivo-in vitro-in silico pharmacokinetic modelling in drug development: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Olavi Pelkonen; Miia Turpeinen; Hannu Raunio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  A comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nevirapine in men, nonpregnant women and women in late pregnancy.

Authors:  Nils von Hentig; Amina Carlebach; Peter Gute; Gaby Knecht; Stefan Klauke; Maren Rohrbacher; Hartmut Stocker; Michael Kurowski; Sebastian Harder; Schlomo Staszewski; Annette Haberl
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected adults.

Authors:  José Moltó; Manuel José Barbanoj; Cristina Miranda; Asunción Blanco; José Ramón Santos; Eugenia Negredo; Joan Costa; Pere Domingo; Bonaventura Clotet; Marta Valle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor pharmacokinetics in a large unselected cohort of HIV-infected women.

Authors:  Monica Gandhi; Leslie Z Benet; Peter Bacchetti; Ann Kalinowski; Kathryn Anastos; Alan R Wolfe; Mary Young; Mardge Cohen; Howard Minkoff; Stephen J Gange; Ruth M Greenblatt
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Model-based approach to characterize efavirenz autoinduction and concurrent enzyme induction with carbamazepine.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Sanjeev Kaul; Partha Nandy; Dennis M Grasela; Marc Pfister
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Influence of the cytochrome P450 2B6 genotype on population pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in human immunodeficiency virus patients.

Authors:  Salvador E Cabrera; Dolores Santos; María P Valverde; Alfonso Domínguez-Gil; Francisco González; Guillermo Luna; María J García
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Antiretroviral pharmacology in mucosal tissues.

Authors:  Corbin G Thompson; Myron S Cohen; Angela D M Kashuba
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 8.  Facilitating compound progression of antiretroviral agents via modeling and simulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Lack of an effect of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection on the pharmacokinetics of entecavir in hepatitis B virus-infected patients.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Marc Bifano; Xu Xu; Yonghua Wang; Frank LaCreta; Dennis Grasela; Marc Pfister
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Drug Exposure to Establish Pharmacokinetic-Response Relationships in Oncology.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; María Jesús Garrido; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.