Literature DB >> 15908481

Impact of the National Service Framework for coronary heart disease on treatment and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndromes.

J J Graham1, A Timmis, J Cooper, S Ramdany, A Deaner, K Ranjadayalan, C Knight.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact the National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease has had on emergency treatment and outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Coronary care units of two district general hospitals.
RESULTS: Data from 3371 patients were recorded, 1993 patients in the 27 months before the introduction of the NSF and 1378 patients in the 24 months afterwards. After the introduction of the NSF in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced (95 patients (4.8%) v 43 (3.2%), p = 0.02). This was associated with a reduction in the development of Q wave myocardial infarction (40.6% v 33.3%, p < 0.0001) and in the incidence of left ventricular failure (15.9% v 12.3%, p = 0.003). The proportion of patients receiving thrombolysis increased (69.4% v 84.7%, p < 0.0001) with a decrease in the time taken to receive it (proportion thrombolysed within 20 minutes 12.1% v 26.6%, p < 0.0001). The prescription of beta blockers (51.9% v 65.8%, p < 0.0001), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (37% v 66.4%, p < 0.0001), and statins (55.2% v 72.7%, p < 0.0001) improved and the proportion of patients referred for invasive investigation increased (18.3% v 27.0%, p < 0.0001). Trend analysis showed that improvements in mortality and thrombolysis were directly associated with publication of the NSF, whereas the improvements seen in prescription of beta blockers and statins were the continuation of pre-existing trends.
CONCLUSIONS: In the two years that followed publication of the NSF the initial treatment and outcome of patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes improved. Some of the improvements can be attributed to the NSF but others are continuations of pre-existing trends.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15908481      PMCID: PMC1860838          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2004.051466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  10 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment.

Authors:  E A Iliadis; L W Klein; B J Vandenberg; D Spokas; T Hursey; J E Parrillo; J E Calvin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  National service framework for coronary heart disease: audit of English hospitals.

Authors:  Michelle Rhodes; Christopher Newman; Susan Read
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

Review 3.  Heart disease, guidelines, regulations, and the law.

Authors:  M C Petch
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Clinical governance: vision or mirage?

Authors:  Neville W Goodman
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

Authors:  T A Marciniak; E F Ellerbeck; M J Radford; T F Kresowik; J A Gold; H M Krumholz; C I Kiefe; R M Allman; R A Vogel; S F Jencks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study. FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-08-28       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of case fatality in south Asian and white patients after acute myocardial infarction: observational study.

Authors:  P Wilkinson; J Sayer; K Laji; C Grundy; B Marchant; P Kopelman; A D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-25

9.  Short and long term prognosis of acute myocardial infarction since introduction of thrombolysis.

Authors:  R Stevenson; K Ranjadayalan; P Wilkinson; R Roberts; A D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-07

10.  Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-08-13       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  The National Service Framework: six years on.

Authors:  R H Swanton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Impact of health care initiatives on outcomes of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  M Moscucci; D Share
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Evaluation of the Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events (EMMACE)-3: protocol for a longitudinal study.

Authors:  O A Alabas; R M West; R G Gillott; R Khatib; A S Hall; C P Gale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Anemia or other comorbidities? using machine learning to reveal deeper insights into the drivers of acute coronary syndromes in hospital admitted patients.

Authors:  Faisal Alsayegh; Moh A Alkhamis; Fatima Ali; Sreeja Attur; Nicholas M Fountain-Jones; Mohammad Zubaid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.