OBJECTIVES: To develop an automated imaging assessment tool that accommodates the anatomic variability of the elderly and demented population as well as the registration errors occurring during spatial normalization. METHODS: 20 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, or normal cognition underwent MRI brain imaging and had their 3D volumetric datasets manually partitioned into 68 regions of interest (ROI) termed sub-volumes. Gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) voxel counts were then made in the subject's native space for comparison against automated volumetric measures within three sub-volume probabilistic atlas (SVPA) models. The three SVPAs were constructed using 12 parameter affine (12 p), 2nd order (2nd), and 6th order (6th) transforms derived from registering the manually partitioned scans into a Talairach compatible AD population-based target. The three SVPA automated measures were compared to the manually derived measures in the 20 subjects' native space with a "jack-knife" procedure in which each subject was assessed by an SVPA they did not contribute toward constructing. RESULTS: The mean left and right GM ratio (GM ratio = [GM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs compared to the manually derived ratios across the 68 ROIs were 0.85 for the 12p SVPA, 0.88 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.89 for the 6th SVPA. The mean left and right WM ratio (WM ratio = [WM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs being 0.84 for the 12p SVPA, 0.86 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.88 for the 6th SVPA. CONCLUSION: We have constructed, from an elderly and demented cohort, an automated brain volumetric tool that has excellent accuracy compared to a manual gold standard and is capable of regional hypothesis testing and individual patient assessment compared to a population.
OBJECTIVES: To develop an automated imaging assessment tool that accommodates the anatomic variability of the elderly and demented population as well as the registration errors occurring during spatial normalization. METHODS: 20 subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mild cognitive impairment, or normal cognition underwent MRI brain imaging and had their 3D volumetric datasets manually partitioned into 68 regions of interest (ROI) termed sub-volumes. Gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) voxel counts were then made in the subject's native space for comparison against automated volumetric measures within three sub-volume probabilistic atlas (SVPA) models. The three SVPAs were constructed using 12 parameter affine (12 p), 2nd order (2nd), and 6th order (6th) transforms derived from registering the manually partitioned scans into a Talairach compatible AD population-based target. The three SVPA automated measures were compared to the manually derived measures in the 20 subjects' native space with a "jack-knife" procedure in which each subject was assessed by an SVPA they did not contribute toward constructing. RESULTS: The mean left and right GM ratio (GM ratio = [GM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs compared to the manually derived ratios across the 68 ROIs were 0.85 for the 12p SVPA, 0.88 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.89 for the 6th SVPA. The mean left and right WM ratio (WM ratio = [WM + CSF] / CSF) "r values" for the 3 SVPAs being 0.84 for the 12p SVPA, 0.86 for the 2nd SVPA, and 0.88 for the 6th SVPA. CONCLUSION: We have constructed, from an elderly and demented cohort, an automated brain volumetric tool that has excellent accuracy compared to a manual gold standard and is capable of regional hypothesis testing and individual patient assessment compared to a population.
Authors: Ivo D Dinov; Daniel Valentino; Bae Cheol Shin; Fotios Konstantinidis; Guogang Hu; Allan MacKenzie-Graham; Erh-Fang Lee; David Shattuck; Jeff Ma; Craig Schwartz; Arthur W Toga Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: David W Shattuck; Mubeena Mirza; Vitria Adisetiyo; Cornelius Hojatkashani; Georges Salamon; Katherine L Narr; Russell A Poldrack; Robert M Bilder; Arthur W Toga Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Karl Young; An-Tao Du; Joel Kramer; Howard Rosen; Bruce Miller; Michael Weiner; Norbert Schuff Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: John S Allen; Joel Bruss; Sonya Mehta; Thomas Grabowski; C Kice Brown; Hanna Damasio Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-06-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M Chupin; A Hammers; R S N Liu; O Colliot; J Burdett; E Bardinet; J S Duncan; L Garnero; L Lemieux Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 6.556