Literature DB >> 1590676

Antimicrobial susceptibility changes in Enterococcus faecalis following various penicillin exposure regimens.

T L Hodges1, S Zighelboim-Daum, G M Eliopoulos, C Wennersten, R C Moellering.   

Abstract

Penicillin-"virgin" strains of Enterococcus faecalis collected from a population of individuals with no previous antibiotic exposure were subjected in vitro to penicillin delivered as repeated pulses, stepwise increasing concentrations, or sustained levels of a single concentration. Changes in resistance to penicillin were assessed by determination of MICs, and time-kill studies were performed to evaluate changes in tolerance to the bactericidal effects of penicillin. Isogenic clones, derived from various exposure regimens, which exhibited changes in either resistance or tolerance were further examined for changes in penicillin-binding proteins. Exposure to repeated pulses of penicillin resulted in the development of tolerance to penicillin without changes in the level of resistance. Clones derived from a regimen of stepwise increases in the penicillin concentration acquired both increased penicillin resistance and tolerance. Clones selected after prolonged continuous exposure to a fixed concentration of penicillin displayed minimally increased resistance to penicillin, but they retained the lytic, nontolerant response to the bactericidal effect of penicillin. Clones which acquired tolerance to the bactericidal effect of penicillin without changes in penicillin resistance exhibited a penicillin-binding protein pattern identical to that of the parental strain. Increased labeling of several penicillin-binding proteins accompanied the development of increased penicillin resistance in both penicillin-tolerant and nontolerant strains. Exposure of E. faecalis to penicillin in repeated pulses of brief duration, for prolonged periods at a constant concentration, or in stepwise graded concentrations can result in the selection of clones with increased resistance to the inhibitory or bactericidal effects of penicillin, or both. These observations may be relevant to the selection of dosing regimes for penicillin in the treatment of enterococcal infections, when bactericidal synergism cannot be achieved with penicillin-aminoglycoside combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1590676      PMCID: PMC189238          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.36.1.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  16 in total

1.  Susceptibility of various serogroups of streptococci to clindamycin and lincomycin.

Authors:  A W Karchmer; R C Moellering; B K Watson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Modification of penicillin-binding proteins of penicillin-resistant mutants of different species of enterococci.

Authors:  S al-Obeid; L Gutmann; R Williamson
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  A H Uttley; C H Collins; J Naidoo; R C George
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988 Jan 2-9       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin.

Authors:  R G Hindes; S H Willey; G M Eliopoulos; L B Rice; C T Eliopoulos; B E Murray; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Continuous-infusion ampicillin therapy of enterococcal endocarditis in rats.

Authors:  C Thauvin; G M Eliopoulos; S Willey; C Wennersten; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Identification of a streptococcal penicillin-binding protein that reacts very slowly with penicillin.

Authors:  R Fontana; R Cerini; P Longoni; A Grossato; P Canepari
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Transferable beta-lactamase. A new mechanism for in vitro penicillin resistance in Streptococcus faecalis.

Authors:  B E Murray; B Mederski-Samaroj
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Antibiotic-induced lysis of enterococci.

Authors:  G A Storch; D J Krogstad
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  High-level resistance to gentamicin in clinical isolates of enterococci.

Authors:  B D Mederski-Samoraj; B E Murray
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Binding of beta-lactam antibiotics to penicillin-binding proteins of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus faecalis: relation to antibacterial activity.

Authors:  N H Georgopapadakou; F Y Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  17 in total

1.  Influence of high-level gentamicin resistance and beta-hemolysis on susceptibility of enterococci to the bactericidal activities of ampicillin and vancomycin.

Authors:  E Cercenado; G M Eliopoulos; C B Wennersten; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Contribution of the autolysin AtlA to the bactericidal activity of amoxicillin against Enterococcus faecalis JH2-2.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Bravetti; Stéphane Mesnage; Agnès Lefort; Françoise Chau; Catherine Eckert; Louis Garry; Michel Arthur; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Diversity among multidrug-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  B E Murray
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Microbiome Heterogeneity Characterizing Intestinal Tissue and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Phenotype.

Authors:  Andrea D Tyler; Richard Kirsch; Raquel Milgrom; Joanne M Stempak; Boyko Kabakchiev; Mark S Silverberg
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.325

5.  Characterization of clinical isolates of beta-lactamase-negative, highly ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  E Cercenado; M F Vicente; M D Díaz; C Sánchez-Carrillo; M Sánchez-Rubiales
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  The Enterococcus: a Model of Adaptability to Its Environment.

Authors:  Mónica García-Solache; Louis B Rice
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Effect of disruption of a gene encoding an autolysin of Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF.

Authors:  X Qin; K V Singh; Y Xu; G M Weinstock; B E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Synergistic effect of amoxicillin and cefotaxime against Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  J L Mainardi; L Gutmann; J F Acar; F W Goldstein
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Antibiotic selection factors and description of a hospital-based outpatient antibiotic therapy program in the USA.

Authors:  W A Craig
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Prevalence of the fsr locus in Enterococcus faecalis infections.

Authors:  S K Pillai; G Sakoulas; H S Gold; C Wennersten; G M Eliopoulos; R C Moellering; R T Inouye
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.