BACKGROUND: Linear polyethylenimine (LPEI) with a molecular weight (MW) of 22 kDa has been described as having a superior ability to induce gene transfer compared to its branched form. However, the transfection efficiency of the polymer cannot be enhanced beyond a certain limit due to cytotoxicity. We explored the potential of utilizing LPEIs with MWs ranging from 1.0 to 9.5 kDa to overcome this limitation. METHODS: Polyplexes of plasmid DNA encoding for the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and various LPEIs were compared concerning their transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity in CHO-K1 and HeLa cells by flow cytometry. The involvement of endolysosomes in LPEI-mediated gene transfer was investigated by applying the proton pump inhibitor bafilomycin A1 and the lysosomotropic agent sucrose. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was applied to assess the size and shape of polyplexes under cell culture conditions, to detect their endolysosomal localization and to observe their translocation to the nucleus. RESULTS: The transfection efficiency could be altered by varying the MW and the amount of the polymer available for polyplex formation. The highest transfection efficiency (about 44%), i.e. the fraction of EGFP-positive cells, was obtained with LPEI 5.6 kDa, while the cytotoxicity remained low. The colocalization of polyplexes and endolysosomes was observed, and it appeared that the larger polyplexes escaped from the acidic organelles particularly quickly. For LPEI 5.0 and 9.0 kDa, the number of cells and nuclei that had taken up DNA after 6 hours was similar, as determined by flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LPEIs with low MWs are promising candidates for non-viral gene delivery, because they are more efficient and substantially less toxic than their higher MW counterparts. 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: Linear polyethylenimine (LPEI) with a molecular weight (MW) of 22 kDa has been described as having a superior ability to induce gene transfer compared to its branched form. However, the transfection efficiency of the polymer cannot be enhanced beyond a certain limit due to cytotoxicity. We explored the potential of utilizing LPEIs with MWs ranging from 1.0 to 9.5 kDa to overcome this limitation. METHODS: Polyplexes of plasmid DNA encoding for the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and various LPEIs were compared concerning their transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity in CHO-K1 and HeLa cells by flow cytometry. The involvement of endolysosomes in LPEI-mediated gene transfer was investigated by applying the proton pump inhibitor bafilomycin A1 and the lysosomotropic agent sucrose. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was applied to assess the size and shape of polyplexes under cell culture conditions, to detect their endolysosomal localization and to observe their translocation to the nucleus. RESULTS: The transfection efficiency could be altered by varying the MW and the amount of the polymer available for polyplex formation. The highest transfection efficiency (about 44%), i.e. the fraction of EGFP-positive cells, was obtained with LPEI 5.6 kDa, while the cytotoxicity remained low. The colocalization of polyplexes and endolysosomes was observed, and it appeared that the larger polyplexes escaped from the acidic organelles particularly quickly. For LPEI 5.0 and 9.0 kDa, the number of cells and nuclei that had taken up DNA after 6 hours was similar, as determined by flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LPEIs with low MWs are promising candidates for non-viral gene delivery, because they are more efficient and substantially less toxic than their higher MW counterparts. 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Kevin Anderson; Antons Sizovs; Mallory Cortez; Chris Waldron; D M Haddleton; Theresa M Reineke Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Hao Yin; Rosemary L Kanasty; Ahmed A Eltoukhy; Arturo J Vegas; J Robert Dorkin; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Nat Rev Genet Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 53.242
Authors: Ahmed A Eltoukhy; Daniel J Siegwart; Christopher A Alabi; Jay S Rajan; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Sue Anne Chew; Michael C Hacker; Anita Saraf; Robert M Raphael; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Thommey P Thomas; Istvan Majoros; Alina Kotlyar; Douglas Mullen; Mark M Banaszak Holl; James R Baker Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 6.988