Literature DB >> 15903173

A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants.

Lars Rasmusson1, Johan Roos, Hans Bystedt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental implants with moderately rough surfaces are commonly used in the treatment of edentulous patients. However, long-term data on survival rates and marginal bone conditions are lacking.
PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluated the cumulative survival rate of the TiOblast implant (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) after 10 years of prosthetic loading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 199 TiOblast implants were placed in 36 consecutive edentulous patients (23 males and 13 females). All patients were treated at one clinic and by the same team. The patients were edentulous in either the maxilla (n = 16) or the mandible (n = 20). The average age of the patients at the start of the trial was 64 years (range, 59-82 years). Of the 199 implants inserted 108 were in the mandible and 91 were in the maxilla. Clinical evaluations were undertaken after completion of the prosthetic superstructure (baseline) and after 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, 7 years, and 10 years. Mean marginal bone level was evaluated for the first 100 placed implants for up to 7 years.
RESULTS: Six implants failed during the study (3 in the mandible and 3 in the maxilla). All failures occurred within the first year, giving a cumulative survival rate of 96.9% (96.6 % in the maxilla and 97.2 % in the mandible) after 10 years of follow-up. The survival rate for the superstructures was 100%. The mean marginal bone level in the measured sample was 0.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.31) below the reference point at baseline, 0.28 mm (SD, 0.20) and 1.27 mm (SD, 1.15) below the same point 7 years later (mean, 0.15 mm per year).
CONCLUSION: This study showed that titanium dioxide-blasted implants offer predictable long-term results as supports for fixed prostheses in both the maxilla and mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15903173     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  22 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review.

Authors:  Qingge Wang; Peng Zhou; Shifeng Liu; Shokouh Attarilar; Robin Lok-Wang Ma; Yinsheng Zhong; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 2.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans.

Authors:  M Rocci; A Rocci; M Martignoni; T Albrektsson; A Barlattani; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

Review 4.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Exposure to titanium dioxide nanomaterials provokes inflammation of an in vitro human immune construct.

Authors:  Brian C Schanen; Ajay S Karakoti; Sudipta Seal; Donald R Drake; William L Warren; William T Self
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Biological response of human bone marrow stromal cells to sandblasted titanium nitride-coated implant surfaces.

Authors:  Marco Annunziata; Luigi Guida; Letizia Perillo; Raffaella Aversa; Irene Passaro; Adriana Oliva
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Increased reactivity and in vitro cell response of titanium based implant surfaces after anodic oxidation.

Authors:  M S Walter; M J Frank; M F Sunding; M Gómez-Florit; M Monjo; M M Bucko; E Pamula; S P Lyngstadaas; H J Haugen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  In vitro osteogenic properties of two dental implant surfaces.

Authors:  Marta Monjo; Christiane Petzold; Joana Maria Ramis; Staale Petter Lyngstadaas; Jan Eirik Ellingsen
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-10-15

9.  Selective antibacterial effects of mixed ZnMgO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jasmina Vidic; Slavica Stankic; Francia Haque; Danica Ciric; Ronan Le Goffic; Aurore Vidy; Jacques Jupille; Bernard Delmas
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading.

Authors:  David Gelb; Bradley McAllister; Pirkka Nummikoski; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.