Literature DB >> 15900672

Histomorphometric and removal torque analysis for TiO2-blasted titanium implants. An experimental study on dogs.

K Gotfredsen1, L Nimb, E Hjörting-Hansen, J S Jensen, A Holmén.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the anchorage of TiO2-blasted screw and cylindrical implants with conventionally used machine-produced screw and cylindrical implants inserted immediately in extraction sockets on dogs. 6 adult mongrel dogs had 3rd and 4th mandibular premolars extracted bilaterally and 24 commercial pure titanium implants were placed immediately in extraction sockets and covered with mucoperiosteum. Each dog had inserted 4 implants: 1 screw implant and 1 cylindrical implant blasted with titanium-dioxide-particles; 1 screw implant and 1 cylindrical implant with machine-produced (m.p.) surface (controls). After a healing period of 12 weeks, 16 implants from 4 animals were used for removal torque test, which demonstrated that significantly higher removal torque force was needed to unscrew the implants blasted with titanium-dioxide-particles, than the normal m.p. implants. The medians for the TiO2-blasted screw and cylindrical implants were > 150 Ncm and 105 Ncm, respectively, while the values for the m.p. implants were 60 Ncm and 35 Ncm, respectively. The SEM investigation demonstrated a high irregularity of the TiO2-blasted surface compared to the machined surface. The Ra and Rz values for surface roughness were higher for the TiO2-blasted implants than for the normal m.p. implants. Histomorphometrically, the arithmetic mean of the direct bone-implant contact fraction was 69%. There was no significant difference in direct bone-implant contact length fraction between TiO2-blasted implants and the control implants. The implants blasted with titanium-dioxide-particles in this study showed a better anchorage than implants with a machine-produced surface. The screw implants showed a better anchorage than the cylindrical implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 15900672     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

Review 1.  Surface treatments and roughness properties of Ti-based biomaterials.

Authors:  Andrea Bagno; Carlo Di Bello
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans.

Authors:  M Rocci; A Rocci; M Martignoni; T Albrektsson; A Barlattani; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

4.  Increased reactivity and in vitro cell response of titanium based implant surfaces after anodic oxidation.

Authors:  M S Walter; M J Frank; M F Sunding; M Gómez-Florit; M Monjo; M M Bucko; E Pamula; S P Lyngstadaas; H J Haugen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in Onlay of Cerament™, a New Ceramic Bone Substitute.

Authors:  Anna Truedsson; Jian-Sheng Wang; Pia Lindberg; Gunnar Warfvinge
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2016-01-07

6.  Retrospective clinical study of an implant with a sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface and internal connection: analysis of short-term success rate and marginal bone loss.

Authors:  Jae-Wang Lee; Jun Hyeong An; Sang-Hoon Park; Jong-Hyon Chong; Gwang-Seok Kim; JeongJoon Han; Seunggon Jung; Min-Suk Kook; Hee-Kyun Oh; Sun-Youl Ryu; Hong-Ju Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-11-05

7.  Effect of Clinically Relevant CAD/CAM Zirconia Polishing on Gingival Fibroblast Proliferation and Focal Adhesions.

Authors:  Nicholas G Fischer; Jeffrey Wong; Andrew Baruth; D Roselyn Cerutis
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Brånemark Implants with an Anodized Surface following Seven-to-Eight Years of Functional Loading.

Authors:  David Gelb; Bradley McAllister; Pirkka Nummikoski; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-03-07

9.  Comparison of removal torques between laser-treated and SLA-treated implant surfaces in rabbit tibiae.

Authors:  Nam-Seok Kang; Lin-Jie Li; Sung-Am Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 10.  New Ti-Alloys and Surface Modifications to Improve the Mechanical Properties and the Biological Response to Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.

Authors:  Yvoni Kirmanidou; Margarita Sidira; Maria-Eleni Drosou; Vincent Bennani; Athina Bakopoulou; Alexander Tsouknidas; Nikolaos Michailidis; Konstantinos Michalakis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.