Literature DB >> 15899326

Patient preferences in randomised controlled trials: conceptual framework and implications for research.

Peter Bower1, Michael King, Irwin Nazareth, Fiona Lampe, Bonnie Sibbald.   

Abstract

Patient preferences have recently been highlighted as a potential threat to the validity of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although there have been significant methodological and statistical developments in relation to these issues, comparatively little attention has been paid to the development of a conceptual model concerning preferences and their effects on decision-making. This article describes the development of such a model, which was undertaken in parallel with a systematic review of the empirical data concerning preference effects. The model describes the concept of preference in terms of theoretical concepts from the psychological and economics literature, and describes a preliminary model of the development and operation of preferences in the context of RCTs. The paper then examines the implications of the model for informed consent and recruitment procedures. Key issues for future research are also outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15899326     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  27 in total

Review 1.  Should desperate volunteers be included in randomised controlled trials?

Authors:  P Allmark; S Mason
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Longitudinal study of new and prevalent use of self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Andrew J Karter; Melissa M Parker; Howard H Moffet; Michele M Spence; James Chan; Susan L Ettner; Joe V Selby
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Patch augmentation surgery for rotator cuff repair: the PARCS mixed-methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Mathew Baldwin; Cushla Cooper; Navraj S Nagra; Joanna C Crocker; Molly Glaze; Gemma Greenall; Amar Rangan; Lucksy Kottam; Jonathan L Rees; Dair Farrar-Hockley; Naomi Merritt; Sally Hopewell; David Beard; Michael Thomas; Melina Dritsaki; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.

Authors:  Robert Pickard; Beatriz Goulao; Sonya Carnell; Jing Shen; Graeme MacLennan; John Norrie; Matt Breckons; Luke Vale; Paul Whybrow; Tim Rapley; Rebecca Forbes; Stephanie Currer; Mark Forrest; Jennifer Wilkinson; Elaine McColl; Daniela Andrich; Stewart Barclay; Jonathan Cook; Anthony Mundy; James N'Dow; Stephen Payne; Nick Watkin
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Patient advocacy and patient centredness in participant recruitment to randomized-controlled trials: implications for informed consent.

Authors:  Zelda Tomlin; Isabel deSalis; Merran Toerien; Jenny L Donovan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Users' reports and evaluations of out-of-hours health care and the UK national quality requirements: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  John Campbell; Martin Roland; Suzanne Richards; Andy Dickens; Michael Greco; Peter Bower
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Exploring treatment preferences facilitated recruitment to randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nicola Mills; Jenny L Donovan; Julia Wade; Freddie C Hamdy; David E Neal; J Athene Lane
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Extension trial of qigong for fibromyalgia: a quantitative and qualitative study.

Authors:  Jana Sawynok; Mary Lynch; Dana Marcon
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 10.  A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.

Authors:  Cara L Booker; Seeromanie Harding; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.