Literature DB >> 15899266

Electricity generation using membrane and salt bridge microbial fuel cells.

Booki Min1, Shaoan Cheng, Bruce E Logan.   

Abstract

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) can be used to directly generate electricity from the oxidation of dissolved organic matter, but optimization of MFCs will require that we know more about the factors that can increase power output such as the type of proton exchange system which can affect the system internal resistance. Power output in a MFC containing a proton exchange membrane was compared using a pure culture (Geobacter metallireducens) or a mixed culture (wastewater inoculum). Power output with either inoculum was essentially the same, with 40+/-1mW/m2 for G. metallireducens and 38+/-1mW/m2 for the wastewater inoculum. We also examined power output in a MFC with a salt bridge instead of a membrane system. Power output by the salt bridge MFC (inoculated with G. metallireducens) was 2.2mW/m2. The low power output was directly attributed to the higher internal resistance of the salt bridge system (19920+/-50 Ohms) compared to that of the membrane system (1286+/-1Ohms) based on measurements using impedance spectroscopy. In both systems, it was observed that oxygen diffusion from the cathode chamber into the anode chamber was a factor in power generation. Nitrogen gas sparging, L-cysteine (a chemical oxygen scavenger), or suspended cells (biological oxygen scavenger) were used to limit the effects of gas diffusion into the anode chamber. Nitrogen gas sparging, for example, increased overall Coulombic efficiency (47% or 55%) compared to that obtained without gas sparging (19%). These results show that increasing power densities in MFCs will require reducing the internal resistance of the system, and that methods are needed to control the dissolved oxygen flux into the anode chamber in order to increase overall Coulombic efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15899266     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  20 in total

Review 1.  Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  Tracking the spectroscopic and chromatographic changes of algal derived organic matter in a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Jin Hur; Bo-Mi Lee; Kwang-Soon Choi; Booki Min
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  The reaction of wastewater treatment and power generation of single chamber microbial fuel cell against substrate concentration and anode distributions.

Authors:  Sing-Mei Tan; Soon-An Ong; Li-Ngee Ho; Yee-Shian Wong; Wei-Eng Thung; Tean-Peng Teoh
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-07-24

4.  Microbial fuel cell assisted nitrate nitrogen removal using cow manure and soil.

Authors:  Ankisha Vijay; Monika Vaishnava; Meenu Chhabra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Increased electrical output when a bacterial ABTS oxidizer is used in a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  William J Hunter; Daniel K Manter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Archaea-based microbial fuel cell operating at high ionic strength conditions.

Authors:  Ximena C Abrevaya; Natalia Sacco; Pablo J D Mauas; Eduardo Cortón
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Isolation of the exoelectrogenic bacterium Ochrobactrum anthropi YZ-1 by using a U-tube microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Yi Zuo; Defeng Xing; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Generation of electricity and analysis of microbial communities in wheat straw biomass-powered microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Yifeng Zhang; Booki Min; Liping Huang; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Microbial community structure elucidates performance of Glyceria maxima plant microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Ruud A Timmers; Michael Rothballer; David P B T B Strik; Marion Engel; Stephan Schulz; Michael Schloter; Anton Hartmann; Bert Hamelers; Cees Buisman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Matthew D Yates; Patrick D Kiely; Douglas F Call; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Kyle Bibby; Jordan Peccia; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.