Literature DB >> 15898914

Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced open microsurgery in an animal model.

Colin G Knight1, Attila Lorincz, Alex Cao, Kelly Gidell, Michael D Klein, Scott E Langenburg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted, robot-enhanced surgery improves laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery through tremor filtration, motion scaling, articulation, and improved ergonomics. Surgeons perform many open cases under magnification that magnifies the tremor present in all surgeons' hands, so the tremor filtration and motion scaling of robotic surgery may improve microsurgery. Our goal was to compare microvascular anastomoses performed with a robot-enhanced technique with a standard technique.
METHODS: We performed end-to-end anastomoses in 1-mm rat femoral arteries with interrupted 10-0 suture. We compared the anastomotic time, patency, and leak rates between traditional microsurgery techniques (by hand) and a robot-enhanced technique using the Zeus robotic surgery system (Computer Motion, Goleta, California). The surgeon used an operative microscope for visualization in both techniques.
RESULTS: We performed 30 anastomoses by hand and 31 with Zeus. We observed a remarkable degree of tremor filtration in the robot-enhanced cases. Anastomotic times for both techniques demonstrated a learning curve. Anastomoses done by hand (mean time, 17.2 minutes) were significantly faster than those done with Zeus (mean time, 27.6 minutes) (P = 0.0006). All anastomoses from both groups were patent, and none leaked after 3 minutes.
CONCLUSION: The Zeus system is effective at performing complex, open, microsurgery tasks in vivo. There was no measurable benefit from the remarkable tremor filtration and motion scaling offered by robot-enhanced surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898914     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2005.15.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

Review 1.  Status of robotic assistance--a less traumatic and more accurate minimally invasive surgery?

Authors:  H G Kenngott; L Fischer; F Nickel; J Rom; J Rassweiler; B P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Overcoming the impact of physiologic tremors in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Gurfarmaan Singh; Wilson Wong Jun Jie; Michelle Tian Sun; Robert Casson; Dinesh Selva; WengOnn Chan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Serik K Akshulakov; Roman A Polkin; Sergey V Ochkal; Ivan A Stepanov; Yerbol T Makhambetov; Talgat T Kerimbayev; Michael Staren; Evgenii Belykh; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-03-28

4.  A Systematic Review of the Role of Robotics in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-From Inception to the Future.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Olivia Cundy; Harsh Samarendra; Khurram Khan; Iain Stuart Whitaker
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-11-15

5.  Current Limitations of Surgical Robotics in Reconstructive Plastic Microsurgery.

Authors:  Youri P A Tan; Philippe Liverneaux; Jason K F Wong
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-03-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.