Literature DB >> 15898388

Use of onplants as stable anchorage for facemask treatment: a case report.

He Hong1, Peter Ngan, Guangli Han, Han Guang Li, Liu Gong Qi, Stephen H Y Wei.   

Abstract

A hexagonal onplant of 7.7 mm diameter was placed on the palatal bone of the maxilla in an 1-year five-month-old female patient with a Class III malocclusion and midface deficiency. Elastic traction (400 g per side) was applied from a facemask to the onplant at 30 degrees to the occlusal plane 12 hours per day for 12 months. The maxilla was found to have displaced forward and downward by 2.9 mm. The mandible was rotated downward and backward. There was a 3 degrees increase in mandibular plane angle and an increase in the lower face height. Clinically, there was a significant improvement in midface esthetics, noted by an increase in fullness of the infraorbital region and correction of the skeletal discrepancy between the maxillary and mandibular jaw relationship. Contrary to the reports that use teeth rather than onplants as anchorage, there was no forward movement of the maxillary molars and minimal extrusion of the maxillary molars. These results suggest that onplants can be used as an extremely stable anchorage for maxillary orthopedic facemask treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15898388     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[453:UOOASA]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

1.  Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction in growing Class III patients.

Authors:  T Baccetti; H J De Clerck; L H Cevidanes; L Franchi
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients.

Authors:  Hugo De Clerck; Lucia Cevidanes; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Bone thickness of the infrazygomatic crest area in skeletal Class III growing patients: A computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Hyub-Soo Lee; Hang-Moon Choi; Dong-Soon Choi; Insan Jang; Bong-Kuen Cha
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2013-12-12

5.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Effects of facemask treatment anchored with miniplates after alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions; a pilot study.

Authors:  Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli; Bahadir Kan; Ferda Tasar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Effectiveness of TAD-anchored maxillary protraction in late mixed dentition.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Feng; Jianhua Li; Yu Li; Zhihe Zhao; Sen Zhao; Jue Wang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

9.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Comparison of skeletal anchored facemask and tooth-borne facemask according to vertical skeletal pattern and growth stage.

Authors:  Sang-Duck Koh; Dong Hwa Chung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.