OBJECTIVE: To explore eating styles associated with intentional weight loss (IWL) and to determine whether the genetic liability in IWL is entirely shared with genetic liability affecting BMI. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: As part of a longitudinal assessment of various health-related behaviors in a large population-based sample of twins, eating styles, BMI, and the number of times the study participants had intentionally lost > or = 5 kg were assessed by questionnaire from 4667 male and female twins (22 to 27 years of age). Associations of eating styles and IWL were explored using polytomous logistic regression models adjusted for BMI. Sex-specific bivariate structural equation modeling was used to explore genetic and environmental correlations of BMI and IWL. RESULTS: Individuals who had engaged in IWL exhibited markedly more restricting, overeating, and alternating restricting/overeating than those in the no-IWL group. Snacking and eating in the evening were characteristic of women with at least two IWL attempts. Eating in response to visual and emotional cues was very pronounced in women who had engaged in IWL but much less so in men. IWL was estimated to have a heritability of 38% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19% to 55%] in men and 66% (95% CI, 55% to 75%) in women. The genetic covariance of BMI and IWL was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.47) for men and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.52) for women. DISCUSSION: Distinct sex differences exist in eating styles associated with IWL and in the heritability of IWL. Most genetic factors affecting BMI are different from those affecting IWL.
OBJECTIVE: To explore eating styles associated with intentional weight loss (IWL) and to determine whether the genetic liability in IWL is entirely shared with genetic liability affecting BMI. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: As part of a longitudinal assessment of various health-related behaviors in a large population-based sample of twins, eating styles, BMI, and the number of times the study participants had intentionally lost > or = 5 kg were assessed by questionnaire from 4667 male and female twins (22 to 27 years of age). Associations of eating styles and IWL were explored using polytomous logistic regression models adjusted for BMI. Sex-specific bivariate structural equation modeling was used to explore genetic and environmental correlations of BMI and IWL. RESULTS: Individuals who had engaged in IWL exhibited markedly more restricting, overeating, and alternating restricting/overeating than those in the no-IWL group. Snacking and eating in the evening were characteristic of women with at least two IWL attempts. Eating in response to visual and emotional cues was very pronounced in women who had engaged in IWL but much less so in men. IWL was estimated to have a heritability of 38% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19% to 55%] in men and 66% (95% CI, 55% to 75%) in women. The genetic covariance of BMI and IWL was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.47) for men and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.41 to 0.52) for women. DISCUSSION: Distinct sex differences exist in eating styles associated with IWL and in the heritability of IWL. Most genetic factors affecting BMI are different from those affecting IWL.
Authors: Thorkild I A Sørensen; Philippe Boutin; Moira A Taylor; Lesli H Larsen; Camilla Verdich; Liselotte Petersen; Claus Holst; Søren M Echwald; Christian Dina; Søren Toubro; Martin Petersen; Jan Polak; Karine Clément; J Alfredo Martínez; Dominique Langin; Jean-Michel Oppert; Vladimir Stich; Ian Macdonald; Peter Arner; Wim H M Saris; Oluf Pedersen; Arne Astrup; Philippe Froguel Journal: PLoS Clin Trials Date: 2006-06-30
Authors: Molly S Bray; Ruth J F Loos; Jeanne M McCaffery; Charlotte Ling; Paul W Franks; George M Weinstock; Michael P Snyder; Jason L Vassy; Tanya Agurs-Collins Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Chenguang Wang; Yun Cheng; Tian Liu; Qin Li; Roger B Fillingim; Margaret R Wallace; Roland Staud; Lee Kaplan; Rongling Wu Journal: Mol Pain Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 3.395