Literature DB >> 15896531

The effect of auditory distractors on song discrimination in male canaries (Serinus canaria).

Didier Appeltants1, Timothy Q Gentner, Stewart H Hulse, Jacques Balthazart, Gregory F Ball.   

Abstract

Male songbirds such as canaries produce complex learned vocalizations that are used in the context of mate attraction and territory defense. Successful mate attraction or territorial defense requires that a bird be able to recognize individuals based on their vocal performance and identify these songs in a noisy background. In order to learn more about how birds are able to solve this problem, we investigated, with a two-alternative choice procedure, the ability of adult male canaries to discriminate between conspecific song segments from two different birds and to maintain this discrimination when conspecific songs are superimposed with a variety of distractors. The results indicate that male canaries have the ability to discriminate, with a high level of accuracy song segments produced by two different conspecific birds. Song discrimination was partially maintained when the stimuli were masked by auditory distractors, but the accuracy of the discrimination progressively declined as a function of the number of masking distractors. The type of distractor used in the experiments (other conspecific songs or different types of artificial white noise) did not markedly affect the rate of deterioration of the song discrimination. These data indicate that adult male canaries have the perceptual abilities to discriminate and selectively attend to one ongoing sound that occurs simultaneously with one or more other sounds. The administration of a noradrenergic neurotoxin did not impair markedly the discrimination learning abilities although the number of subjects tested was too small to allow any firm conclusion. In these conditions, however, the noradrenergic lesion significantly increased the number failures to respond in the discrimination learning task suggesting a role, in canaries, of the noradrenergic system in some attentional processes underlying song learning and processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15896531     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  12 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 2.  Estradiol-dependent modulation of auditory processing and selectivity in songbirds.

Authors:  Donna L Maney; Donna Maney; Raphael Pinaud
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Incorporating naturalistic correlation structure improves spectrogram reconstruction from neuronal activity in the songbird auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Alexandro D Ramirez; Yashar Ahmadian; Joseph Schumacher; David Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical activity patterns predict robust speech discrimination ability in noise.

Authors:  Jai A Shetake; Jordan T Wolf; Ryan J Cheung; Crystal T Engineer; Satyananda K Ram; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).

Authors:  Micheal L Dent; Elizabeth M McClaine; Virginia Best; Erol Ozmeral; Rajiv Narayan; Frederick J Gallun; Kamal Sen; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 6.  What birdsong can teach us about the central noradrenergic system.

Authors:  Christina B Castelino; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 3.052

7.  Own song selectivity in the songbird auditory pathway: suppression by norepinephrine.

Authors:  Colline Poirier; Tiny Boumans; Michiel Vellema; Geert De Groof; Thierry D Charlier; Marleen Verhoye; Annemie Van der Linden; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rapid effects of hearing song on catecholaminergic activity in the songbird auditory pathway.

Authors:  Lisa L Matragrano; Michaël Beaulieu; Jessica O Phillip; Ali I Rae; Sara E Sanford; Keith W Sockman; Donna L Maney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automated annotation of birdsong with a neural network that segments spectrograms.

Authors:  Yarden Cohen; David Aaron Nicholson; Alexa Sanchioni; Emily K Mallaber; Viktoriya Skidanova; Timothy J Gardner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 10.  Scene analysis in the natural environment.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki; Bruno A Olshausen; Annemarie Surlykke; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.