Literature DB >> 15896506

Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.

Joy C M Lau1, Cecilia W P Li-Tsang, Y P Zheng.   

Abstract

One of the characteristics of hypertrophic scarring is its raised appearance. Its maturation often results in increased thickness. Therapists usually rely on subjective observation and palpation to document scar thickness. The result of these subjective assessments may reflect only the superficial scar thickness but is unable to measure the whole scar volume and thickness under the skin surface. Measurement of scar thickness using ultrasound imaging has been previously reported, but has not been commonly used in clinics due to its complex operation method and high cost. In this study, we have adopted a newly developed and user-friendly Tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) for the assessment of scar thickness. It consists of a finger size palpation probe, connected to an ultrasound transducer and an in-series load cell to measure the thickness of the soft tissue over the human body. The method of operation is easy and it can be used to measure skin thickness on various parts of the body, thus reflecting the skin thickness. The reliability of the TUPS in clinical application was tested on 30 subjects with a hypertrophic scar at a local hospital. Three raters implemented two assessments on each subject to study its test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities. It was then used to assess 100 subjects with various severity of hypertrophic scar caused by trauma, scald, burn or surgery. They were assessed using TUPS as well as the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) for rating scar thickness, pliability, pigmentation and vascularity. Two-way mixed intra-class correlation showed a high test-retest reliability with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)=0.98 and inter-rater reliability ICC=0.84. Fair positive correlations with VSS thickness score and VSS total score r=0.34 (p<0.05) and 0.42 (p<0.05), respectively. A significant difference between two scar type groups (50 burn scald scars and 50 surgical scars) was demonstrated (d.f.=52.94, t=3.99, p<0.01). TUPS was proved to have high inter-rater, test-retest reliability and it had a moderate correlation with the VSS that clinicians used for assessment of the scar. This system is recommended for clinical assessment of scar thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15896506     DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Burns        ISSN: 0305-4179            Impact factor:   2.744


  14 in total

1.  Quantification of the physical properties of keloid and hypertrophic scars using the Vesmeter novel sensing device.

Authors:  Ahmatjan Niyaz; Hajime Matsumura; Katsueki Watanabe; Tetsukazu Hamamoto; Takayasu Matsusawa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  The validity and reliability of using ultrasound elastography to measure cutaneous stiffness, a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen M DeJong; Steven Abbott; Marilyn Zelesco; Brendan F Kennedy; Mel R Ziman; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-12-20

3.  An optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based air jet indentation system for measuring the mechanical properties of soft tissues.

Authors:  Yan-Ping Huang; Yong-Ping Zheng; Shu-Zhe Wang; Zhong-Ping Chen; Qing-Hua Huang; Yong-Hong He
Journal:  Meas Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.046

4.  Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients.

Authors:  Gabriel A Mecott; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon; Ahmed M Al-Mousawi; Ludwik K Branski; Sachin Hegde; Robert Kraft; Felicia N Williams; Susana A Maldonado; Haidy G Rivero; Noe Rodriguez-Escobar; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices.

Authors:  Regina Fearmonti; Jennifer Bond; Detlev Erdmann; Howard Levinson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-06-21

6.  Investigation of soft-tissue stiffness alteration in denervated human tissue using an ultrasound indentation system.

Authors:  Mohsen Makhsous; Ganapriya Venkatasubramanian; Aditya Chawla; Yagna Pathak; Michael Priebe; William Z Rymer; Fang Lin
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  High-resolution harmonics ultrasound imaging for non-invasive characterization of wound healing in a pre-clinical swine model.

Authors:  Surya C Gnyawali; Kasturi G Barki; Shomita S Mathew-Steiner; Sriteja Dixith; Daniel Vanzant; Jayne Kim; Jennifer L Dickerson; Soma Datta; Heather Powell; Sashwati Roy; Valerie Bergdall; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Autologous Graft Thickness Affects Scar Contraction and Quality in a Porcine Excisional Wound Model.

Authors:  Rodney K Chan; Lloyd F Rose; Jesse C Wu; David I Tucker; Maren M Chan; Robert J Christy; Robert G Hale; Kai P Leung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 9.  A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.

Authors:  Kwang Chear Lee; Janine Dretzke; Liam Grover; Ann Logan; Naiem Moiemen
Journal:  Burns Trauma       Date:  2016-04-27

Review 10.  Scar Assessment Tools: How Do They Compare?

Authors:  Amanda Min Hui Choo; Yee Siang Ong; Fadi Issa
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.