Literature DB >> 15895630

Attractiveness of own-race, other-race, and mixed-race faces.

Gillian Rhodes1, Kieran Lee, Romina Palermo, Mahi Weiss, Sakiko Yoshikawa, Peter Clissa, Tamsyn Williams, Marianne Peters, Chris Winkler, Linda Jeffery.   

Abstract

Averaged face composites, which represent the central tendency of a familiar population of faces, are attractive. If this prototypicality contributes to their appeal, then averaged composites should be more attractive when their component faces come from a familiar, own-race population than when they come from a less familiar, other-race population. We compared the attractiveness of own-race composites, other-race composites, and mixed-race composites (where the component faces were from both races). In experiment 1, Caucasian participants rated own-race composites as more attractive than other-race composites, but only for male faces. However, mixed-race (Caucasian/Japanese) composites were significantly more attractive than own-race composites, particularly for the opposite sex. In experiment 2, Caucasian and Japanese participants living in Australia and Japan, respectively, selected the most attractive face from a continuum with exaggerated Caucasian characteristics at one end and exaggerated Japanese characteristics at the other, with intervening images including a Caucasian averaged composite, a mixed-race averaged composite, and a Japanese averaged composite. The most attractive face was, again, a mixed-race composite, for both Caucasian and Japanese participants. In experiment 3, Caucasian participants rated individual Eurasian faces as significantly more attractive than either Caucasian or Asian faces. Similar results were obtained with composites. Eurasian faces and composites were also rated as healthier than Caucasian or Asian faces and composites, respectively. These results suggest that signs of health may be more important than prototypicality in making average faces attractive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15895630     DOI: 10.1068/p5191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  8 in total

1.  Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test reflect familiarity or affect?

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Marie Peek-O'Leary
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

2.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

3.  Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments: implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Remembering beauty: roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces.

Authors:  Takashi Tsukiura; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Locating attractiveness in the face space: faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype.

Authors:  Timothy Potter; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

6.  New "golden" ratios for facial beauty.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Stephen Link; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Filtered beauty in Oslo and Tokyo: A spatial frequency analysis of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Morten Øvervoll; Ilaria Schettino; Hikaru Suzuki; Matia Okubo; Bruno Laeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Social and affective neuroscience: an Australian perspective.

Authors:  Fiona Kumfor; Lincoln M Tracy; Grace Wei; Yu Chen; Juan F Domínguez D; Sarah Whittle; Travis Wearne; Michelle Kelly
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.436

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.